Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

The Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy catalog approach for gravitational wave cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.08694 v1 pith:IPYY3BSB submitted 2022-12-16 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords galaxymethodapproachcatalogdarkdatasirenstatistical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We outline the ``dark siren'' galaxy catalog method for cosmological inference using gravitational wave (GW) standard sirens, clarifying some common misconceptions in the implementation of this method. When a confident transient electromagnetic counterpart to a GW event is unavailable, the identification of a unique host galaxy is in general challenging. Instead, as originally proposed by Schutz (1986), one can consult a galaxy catalog and implement a dark siren statistical approach incorporating all potential host galaxies within the localization volume. Trott & Hunterer 2021 recently claimed that this approach results in a biased estimate of the Hubble constant, $H_0$, when implemented on mock data, even if optimistic assumptions are made. We demonstrate explicitly that, as previously shown by multiple independent groups, the dark siren statistical method leads to an unbiased posterior when the method is applied to the data correctly. We highlight common sources of error possible to make in the generation of mock data and implementation of the statistical framework, including the mismodeling of selection effects and inconsistent implementations of the Bayesian framework, which can lead to a spurious bias.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When (not) to trust Monte Carlo approximations for hierarchical Bayesian inference

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A unified error statistic E-hat measures information lost to Monte Carlo noise in hierarchical Bayesian inference, with a recommended cutoff of 0.2 bits.

  2. Fortifying gravitational-wave population inference with normalizing flows

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Representing each gravitational-wave event's posterior with a normalizing flow lets analysts generate enough cheap posterior samples to keep the Monte-Carlo variance of population inference below threshold for catalog...

  3. A pipeline for searching and fitting instrumental glitches in LISA data

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A reversible-jump MCMC pipeline simultaneously fits LISA instrumental glitches, noise, and a massive black hole binary signal, validated on simulated and modified Spritz challenge data.

  4. Inferring cosmological parameters from galaxy and dark sirens cross-correlation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A full-likelihood forecast shows dark-siren×galaxy cross-correlations with 3G detectors and Euclid could constrain H0 at 0.7% and complement galaxy clustering on other parameters.

  5. Gravitational Wave Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 unverdicted

    A review of standard siren cosmology: gravitational wave sources measure luminosity distance directly, and redshift comes from electromagnetic counterparts, galaxy catalogs, or mass spectrum features.

Pith tools