REVIEW 2 cited by
Transverse spin asymmetries at the EIC as a probe of anomalous electric and magnetic dipole moments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We show that inclusive single-spin asymmetries (SSAs) with transversely polarized protons or electrons at a future electron ion collider (EIC) are sensitive to new physics contributions to electroweak dipole operators of electrons and quarks. We use the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) to parameterize possible heavy new physics contributions to these couplings. We show that new physics scales at or beyond the TeV-scale can be probed assuming realistic EIC run parameters, and that the transverse spin asymmetries are sensitive to different combinations of the dipole couplings than other measurements such as anomalous magnetic or electric dipole moments. We also study the physics potential of SSAs at a possible future upgrade of the EIC to collide muons and protons. Measurements at such an upgrade could probe the same SMEFT parameters that explain the current anomaly in the muon anomalous magnetic moment, and could also improve current bounds on the muon electric dipole moment.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders
A dihadron fragmentation azimuthal asymmetry at e+e− colliders can probe light-quark Yukawa couplings linearly and separate y_u from y_d at the 10^-4 level.
-
Flavor physics at the EIC with b-jet tagging
Single b-jet counting in charged-current events at the EIC could probe new flavor-changing physics up to Λ_eff ≈ 5 TeV, about 30 times the collider energy, assuming tight b-tagging and polarized beams.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.