Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.10572 v1 pith:LA5FJDMJ submitted 2023-01-25 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords tensionconstantdainottihubbleredshiftcosmologicalestimatedgalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Hubble constant ($H_0$) tension is one of the major open problems in modern cosmology. This tension is the discrepancy, ranging from 4 to 6 $\sigma$, between the $H_0$ value estimated locally with the combination of Supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) + Cepheids and the cosmological $H_0$ obtained through the study of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation. The approaches adopted in Dainotti et al. 2021 (ApJ) and Dainotti et al. 2022 (Galaxies) are introduced. Through a binning division of the Pantheon sample of SNe Ia (Scolnic et al. 2018), the value of $H_0$ has been estimated in each of the redshift-ordered bins and fitted with a function lowering with the redshift. The results show a decreasing trend of $H_0$ with redshift. If this is not due to astrophysical biases or residual redshift evolution of the SNe Ia parameters, it can be explained in light of modified gravity theories, e.g., the $f(R)$ scenarios. We also briefly describe the possible impact of high-$z$ probes on the Hubble constant tension, such as Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and Quasars (QSOs), reported in Dainotti et al. 2022 (Galaxies) and Lenart et al. 2022 (ApJ), respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Balanced Field Summaries of the Large-Scale Structure with the Neural Field Scattering Transform

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On simulated weak lensing maps, the Neural Field Scattering Transform with trained filters improves constraints on sigma_8 and w by 6-11% and posterior density by about 17% over the standard Wavelet Scattering Transform.

  2. Interpretation of the binned SNe Ia Master Sample data via a scalar quintessence component: phantom transition?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Viscous quintessence model fitted to binned SNe Ia data shows no phantom transition and lower transition redshift than DESI.

  3. On the initial conditions of the $\nu$HDM cosmological model

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Bayesian fit of the νHDM (MOND plus sterile neutrino) cosmology to Planck CMB data returns H0≈56 km/s/Mpc and Ωm≈0.5, with a much worse fit than ΛCDM.

  4. QCD CP-violation scenario for a revised cosmological dynamics: analysis of the binned Pantheon Sample of Super Novae Ia

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper fits a dark-matter–dark-energy interaction model from a complex scalar field to binned Pantheon SNeIa data and claims to explain the redshift-running H0, but the derivation's equations are internally inconsistent.

Pith tools