Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Performative Recommendation: Diversifying Content via Strategic Incentives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04336 v3 pith:324GLGTE submitted 2023-02-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords contentdiversityrecommendationstrategicapproachdemonstratediverseperformative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The primary goal in recommendation is to suggest relevant content to users, but optimizing for accuracy often results in recommendations that lack diversity. To remedy this, conventional approaches such as re-ranking improve diversity by presenting more diverse items. Here we argue that to promote inherent and prolonged diversity, the system must encourage its creation. Towards this, we harness the performative nature of recommendation, and show how learning can incentivize strategic content creators to create diverse content. Our approach relies on a novel form of regularization that anticipates strategic changes to content, and penalizes for content homogeneity. We provide analytic and empirical results that demonstrate when and how diversity can be incentivized, and experimentally demonstrate the utility of our approach on synthetic and semi-synthetic data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Search results diversification in competitive search

    cs.IR 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues, via game theory and student ranking competitions, that diversity-based search ranking reduces 'mimicking the winner' herding, but the equilibrium proof and the empirical test are both flawed.

Pith tools