REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum gravity constraints on scale separation and de Sitter in five dimensions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We give evidence that supersymmetric anti-de Sitter vacua of five-dimensional supergravity cannot be scale separated as a consequence of quantum gravity constraints, such as the weak gravity conjecture or the species scale. We show this in a model-independent way for the minimal and the maximal theory and we believe that the argument can be extended to any amount of preserved supercharges in the between. If combined with previous works stating that non-supersymmetric anti-de Sitter vacua must be unstable, our results suggest that no genuinely five-dimensional effective theory in anti-de Sitter exists. At the cost of introducing an additional assumption on the gravitino mass, we can extend our analysis to de Sitter vacua as well. However, the few known stable de Sitter vacua of minimal five-dimensional supergravity do not satisfy such an assumption and thus evade our constraints. This suggest that they are on a somehow different footing than their four-dimensional counterparts and therefore deserve further investigation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Banks-Zaks Stabilisation of Non-SUSY Strings
In non-supersymmetric strings, scale-separated AdS vacua can form when the accidentally small one-loop vacuum energy from massive states balances the two-loop Casimir energy of massless states, a Banks-Zaks-like fixed point.
-
Integer dual dimensions in scale-separated AdS$_3$ from massive IIA
Massive IIA flux compactifications on singular and Joyce G2 orbifolds yield scale-separated AdS3 vacua whose dual operator dimensions are integer up to parametrically small corrections.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.