REVIEW 1 cited by
Solving Regularized Exp, Cosh and Sinh Regression Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In modern machine learning, attention computation is a fundamental task for training large language models such as Transformer, GPT-4 and ChatGPT. In this work, we study exponential regression problem which is inspired by the softmax/exp unit in the attention mechanism in large language models. The standard exponential regression is non-convex. We study the regularization version of exponential regression problem which is a convex problem. We use approximate newton method to solve in input sparsity time. Formally, in this problem, one is given matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, $b \in \mathbb{R}^n$, $w \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and any of functions $\exp, \cosh$ and $\sinh$ denoted as $f$. The goal is to find the optimal $x$ that minimize $ 0.5 \| f(Ax) - b \|_2^2 + 0.5 \| \mathrm{diag}(w) A x \|_2^2$. The straightforward method is to use the naive Newton's method. Let $\mathrm{nnz}(A)$ denote the number of non-zeros entries in matrix $A$. Let $\omega$ denote the exponent of matrix multiplication. Currently, $\omega \approx 2.373$. Let $\epsilon$ denote the accuracy error. In this paper, we make use of the input sparsity and purpose an algorithm that use $\log ( \|x_0 - x^*\|_2 / \epsilon)$ iterations and $\widetilde{O}(\mathrm{nnz}(A) + d^{\omega} )$ per iteration time to solve the problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Universal Approximation of Visual Autoregressive Transformers
The paper's headline claim that VAR transformers universally approximate all Lipschitz image maps is not supported, because the theorem restricts the target class and its key lemma has an invalid linearity step.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.