REVIEW 5 cited by
Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing with HSC and SDSS using the Minimal Bias Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present cosmological parameter constraints from a blind joint analysis of three two-point correlation functions measured from the Year 3 Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC-Y3) imaging data, covering 416 deg$^2$, and the SDSS DR11 spectroscopic galaxies spanning the redshift range $[0.15, 0.70]$. We subdivide the SDSS galaxies into three volume-limited samples separated in redshift, each of which acts as a large-scale structure tracer characterized by the measurement of the projected correlation function, $w_{\rm p}(R)$. We also use the measurements of the galaxy-galaxy weak lensing signal $\Delta \Sigma(R)$ for each of these SDSS samples which act as lenses for a secure sample of source galaxies selected from the HSC-Y3 shape catalog based on their photometric redshifts. We combine these measurements with the cosmic shear correlation functions, $\xi_{\pm}(\vartheta)$, measured for our HSC source sample. We model these observables with the minimal bias model of the galaxy clustering observables in the context of a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. We use conservative scale cuts, $R>12$ and $8~h^{-1}$Mpc, for $\Delta\Sigma$ and $w_{\rm p}$, respectively, where the minimal bias model is valid, in addition to conservative prior on the residual bias in the mean redshift of the HSC photometric source galaxies. Our baseline analysis yields $S_8=0.775^{+0.043}_{-0.038}$ (68% C.I.) for the $\Lambda$CDM model, after marginalizing over uncertainties in other parameters. Our value of $S_8$ is consistent with that from the Planck 2018 data, but the credible interval of our result is still relatively large. Our results are statistically consistent with those of a companion paper, which extends this analysis to smaller scales with an emulator-based halo model.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Cosmological evolution with decaying dark matter: an integral-equation approach
CLASSIER-DDM evaluates generic two-body decaying dark matter perturbations via iterative integral equations at O(0.1%) accuracy and O(1 min) cost without a Boltzmann hierarchy or fluid approximation.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample
DES Y6 calibrates MagLim++ lens galaxy redshift distributions to 1-2% mean accuracy using SOM-based photometric redshifts plus clustering redshifts, with uncertainties compressed into a few modes.
-
Cosmology and Source Redshift Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Weak Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model
Galaxy clustering plus weak lensing from HSC Y3 and SDSS gives S8 = 0.780 ± 0.030 and lensing-only redshift offsets Δz3 = -0.112, Δz4 = -0.185.
-
$\Lambda$CDM and early dark energy in latent space: a data-driven parametrization of the CMB temperature power spectrum
A variational autoencoder compresses CMB temperature spectra into 5 (LambdaCDM) or 8 (with early dark energy) latent parameters that reconstruct the data within Planck errors and can be constrained with Planck observations.
-
Modelling Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model and Redshift Self-Calibration
Combining SDSS clustering with HSC Y3 galaxy-galaxy lensing, with a point-mass correction down to 2 Mpc/h, gives S8 = 0.804 ± 0.051 and self-calibrated redshift shifts for the two highest source bins.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.