REVIEW 2 cited by
Light-Cone Sum Rules for $S$-wave $B\to K\pi$ Form Factors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We derive a set of light-cone sum rules relating the $S$-wave $B\to K \pi$ hadronic form factors to the $B$-meson light-cone distribution amplitudes (LCDAs), taking into account the complete set of LCDAs up to and including twist four. These results complement the sum rules for the $P$-wave $B\to K \pi$ form factors obtained earlier. We then use the new sum rules to estimate the $S$-wave contributions to $B\to K \pi\ell\ell$ decays as a function of the $K\pi$ invariant mass. We pay particular attention to the fact that the $S$-wave $K\pi$ spectrum cannot be modelled by a sum of Breit-Wigner resonances, and employ a more consistent dispersive coupled-channel approach. We compare our predictions for branching ratios and angular observables with LHCb measurements in two different kinematic regions, around $K^*(892)$ and $K^*_0(1430)$. We observe an overall compatibility and discuss possible improvements of our model to obtain a better description of the $B\to K\pi$ form factors over a large kinematic range.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Precision calculations of $B\to K^*$ form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions
New subleading-power corrections to B to K* form factors from SCET sum rules yield SM branching fractions BR(Bbar0 to Kbar*0 nu nubar)=8.09(96)e-6 and F_L=0.44(4).
-
Studying the tensor resonance contributions in $B \to PP\ell^+\ell^-$ and $B \to PV\ell^+\ell^-$ decays
Tensor-resonance contributions to B → PPℓ⁺ℓ⁻ and B → PVℓ⁺ℓ⁻ are small compared with measured totals once SU(3)-related B → Tℓ⁺ℓ⁻ rates are fixed to Bs → f′₂(1525)μ⁺μ⁻.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.