Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Observational constraints on power law Starobinsky inflation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.00682 v2 pith:FCLUC4MW submitted 2023-05-01 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords inflationobservationsbetaparameterspowerbicep3constraintscurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this work we revisit power law, $\frac{1}{M^2}R^\beta$, inflation to find the deviations from $R^2$ inflation allowed by current CMB and LSS observations. We compute the power spectra for scalar and tensor perturbations numerically and perform MCMC analysis to put constraints on parameters $M$ and $\beta$ from Planck-2018, BICEP3 and other LSS observations. We consider general reheating scenario and also vary the number of e-foldings during inflation, $N_{pivot}$, along with the other parameters. We find $\beta = 1.966^{+0.035}_{-0.042}$, $M= \left(3.31^{+5}_{-2}\right)\times 10^{-5}$ and $N_{pivot} = 41^{+10}_{-10}$ with $95\%\, C.\, L.$. This indicates that the current observations allow deviation from Starobinsky inflation. The scalar spectral index, $n_s$, and tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, derived from these parameters, are consistent with the Planck and BICEP3 observations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring generalized Starobinsky Model of Inflation: Observational Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The power-law Starobinsky model is constrained to beta = 1.987 +0.013/-0.016 and log10 M = -4.72 +0.21/-0.20 at 95% CL, consistent with the standard R^2 model within 95% confidence.

Pith tools