REVIEW 2 cited by
CURTAINs Flows For Flows: Constructing Unobserved Regions with Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Model independent techniques for constructing background data templates using generative models have shown great promise for use in searches for new physics processes at the LHC. We introduce a major improvement to the CURTAINs method by training the conditional normalizing flow between two side-band regions using maximum likelihood estimation instead of an optimal transport loss. The new training objective improves the robustness and fidelity of the transformed data and is much faster and easier to train. We compare the performance against the previous approach and the current state of the art using the LHC Olympics anomaly detection dataset, where we see a significant improvement in sensitivity over the original CURTAINs method. Furthermore, CURTAINsF4F requires substantially less computational resources to cover a large number of signal regions than other fully data driven approaches. When using an efficient configuration, an order of magnitude more models can be trained in the same time required for ten signal regions, without a significant drop in performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generative Amplification with Surrogate Monte Carlo
An amplitude surrogate trained on a few thousand exact LHC amplitude points statistically outperforms the training data, with largest amplification in sparsely populated kinematic tails of Z+g and Z+4g production.
-
Robust resonant anomaly detection with NPLM
NPLM-based classifiers and end-to-end NPLM outperform BDT-based anomaly detection at low signal injection on the LHCO and RODEM benchmarks, with lower variance across hyperparameters.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.