Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Centralizing Effects of Private Order Flow on Proposer-Builder Separation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.19150 v2 pith:CB74JH2T submitted 2023-05-30 econ.TH

classification econ.TH
keywords floworderprivatebuildersintegratedtop-of-blockadvantageauction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The current Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) equilibrium has several builders with different backgrounds winning blocks consistently. This paper considers how that equilibrium will shift when transactions are sold privately via order flow auctions (OFAs) rather than forwarded directly to the public mempool. We discuss a novel model that highlights the augmented value of private order flow for integrated builder searchers. We show that private order flow is complementary to top-of-block opportunities, and therefore integrated builder-searchers are more likely to participate in OFAs and outbid non integrated builders. They will then parlay access to these private transactions into an advantage in the PBS auction, winning blocks more often and extracting higher profits than non-integrated builders. To validate our main assumptions, we construct a novel dataset pairing post-merge PBS outcomes with realized 12-second volatility on a leading CEX (Binance). Our results show that integrated builder-searchers are more likely to win in the PBS auction when realized volatility is high, suggesting that indeed such builders have an advantage in extracting top-of-block opportunities. Our findings suggest that modifying PBS to disentangle the intertwined dynamics between top-of-block extraction and private order flow would pave the way for a fairer and more decentralized Ethereum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Does multi-block MEV exist? Analysis of 2 years of MEV Data

    cs.GT 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 4.3 million post-Merge slots, multi-slot builder sequences are less common than a random baseline, payments grow modestly with sequence length, and no builder specialization by base-fee volatility is found.

Pith tools