Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Dark energy-matter equivalence by the evolution of cosmic equation of state

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.08396 v2 pith:4LBDLF7F submitted 2023-06-14 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords darkenergyconsiderfirstmodeluniversebaryoniccompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider a model-independent approach to constrain the equivalence redshift, $z_{eq}$, at which dark energy and the total matter (cold dark matter and baryonic) equate their magnitudes. To this aim, in the context of a homogeneous and isotropic universe, we first consider a generic model where the dark energy contribution is provided by an unknown function of barotropic fluids. Afterwards, we compute the deceleration and jerk parameters, evaluating at our epoch, namely $z=0$, and at $z=z_{eq}$. Thus, by Taylor expanding around current time the Hubble rate, luminosity and angular distances, we substitute the theoretical expressions obtained from the aforementioned generic dark energy model, defining a correspondence between quantities evaluated at $z=0$ and $z=z_{eq}$. In so doing, we directly fit these quantities by means of current data sets, involving the most recent Pantheon type Ia supernovae, baryonic acoustic oscillation and Hubble rate points. We consider two hierarchies in our fitting procedures and compare our findings in the spatially-flat universe first and including spatial curvature, later. We assess constraints on the overall equation of state of the universe and its first derivative. We compare our results with those predicted by the standard $\Lambda$CDM paradigm. Specifically, our findings are in agreement at the 2$\sigma$ confidence level, assuming a constant dark energy term. However, our analysis does not rule out the possibility of a slight evolution of dark energy, indicating a small deviation from the scenario of a pure cosmological constant. In particular, the possible departures appear consistent with a phenomenological $\omega$CDM model, rather than more complicated dark energy parameterizations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do we really need alternatives to the $\omega_0\omega_a$CDM parameterization after the DESI DR2?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a common physically motivated pivot basis, the standard CPL parameterization is mildly preferred over the fafbCDM density expansion and reproduces quintessence backgrounds at least as well.

  2. Transit dark energy cosmological models in generalized matter-geometry coupling theory using a non-linear form of $f(R,T,L_{m})$ function

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A modified f(R,T,L_m) gravity model, fitted to CC and Pantheon data, yields an accelerating late-time universe with transition redshift near 0.6 and an effective dark energy equation of state within 1e-5 of -1.

  3. Cosmic distance duality after DESI 2024 data release and dark energy evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using DESI BAO, galaxy clusters, supernovae and Hubble data, the authors find no evidence for violation of the cosmic distance duality and favor flat ΛCDM.

  4. Cosmological implications and causality in $f(R, L_{m}, T)$ gravity theory with observational constraints

    gr-qc 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Four f(R,Lm,T) fluid models are fitted to CC+Pantheon+SH0ES data, but the assumed matter conservation contradicts the theory's field equations.

Pith tools