REVIEW 1 cited by
Composite QDrift-Product Formulas for Quantum and Classical Simulations in Real and Imaginary Time
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Recent work has shown that it can be advantageous to implement a composite channel that partitions the Hamiltonian $H$ for a given simulation problem into subsets $A$ and $B$ such that $H=A+B$, where the terms in $A$ are simulated with a Trotter-Suzuki channel and the $B$ terms are randomly sampled via the QDrift algorithm. Here we show that this approach holds in imaginary time, making it a candidate classical algorithm for quantum Monte-Carlo calculations. We upper-bound the induced Schatten-$1 \to 1$ norm on both imaginary-time QDrift and Composite channels. Another recent result demonstrated that simulations of Hamiltonians containing geometrically-local interactions for systems defined on finite lattices can be improved by decomposing $H$ into subsets that contain only terms supported on that subset of the lattice using a Lieb-Robinson argument. Here, we provide a quantum algorithm by unifying this result with the composite approach into ``local composite channels" and we upper bound the diamond distance. We provide exact numerical simulations of algorithmic cost by counting the number of gates of the form $e^{-iH_j t}$ and $e^{-H_j \beta}$ to meet a certain error tolerance $\epsilon$. We show constant factor advantages for a variety of interesting Hamiltonians, the maximum of which is a $\approx 20$ fold speedup that occurs for a simulation of Jellium.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimal Lower Bounds for Hamiltonian Simulation
There exist simple weighted-local Hamiltonians for which quantum simulation requires Ω(min over K of (Kt + t²λ_K²/ε)) gates — exactly matching the composite qDRIFT algorithm's cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.