Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

How robust are gravitational wave predictions from cosmological phase transitions?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.05474 v2 pith:IZATJSLG submitted 2023-09-11 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords phasetransitionspredictionsmagnitudesupercooledamplitudeapproximationsbubble
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gravitational wave (GW) predictions of cosmological phase transitions are almost invariably evaluated at either the nucleation or percolation temperature. We investigate the effect of the transition temperature choice on GW predictions, for phase transitions with weak, intermediate and strong supercooling. We find that the peak amplitude of the GW signal varies by a factor of a few for weakly supercooled phase transitions, and by an order of magnitude for strongly supercooled phase transitions. The variation in amplitude for even weakly supercooled phase transitions can be several orders of magnitude if one uses the mean bubble separation, while the variation is milder if one uses the mean bubble radius instead. We also investigate the impact of various approximations used in GW predictions. Many of these approximations introduce at least a 10% error in the GW signal, with others introducing an error of over an order of magnitude.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Waves from Dark Gauge Sectors

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dark SU(2) gauge sector that explains vector dark matter can produce LISA-detectable gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition, with a companion six-top signature at the HL-LHC.

  2. RGE effects on new physics searches via gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Future GW experiments retain sensitivity to several SMEFT operators despite renormalization scale uncertainties, provided the leading (H†H)^3 operator is measured by colliders.

  3. Supercooled Phase Transitions: Why Thermal History of Hidden Sector Matters in Analysis of Pulsar Timing Array Signals

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tracking the evolving temperature ratio between hidden and visible sectors can change a supercooled hidden-sector phase transition's gravitational wave spectrum by up to four orders of magnitude, reviving it as an exp...

  4. Measuring gravitational wave spectrum from electroweak phase transition and Higgs self-couplings

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using simulated Taiji data, the authors show that a stochastic gravitational-wave signal from an electroweak phase transition in the singlet-extended Standard Model can constrain the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings.

  5. PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PhaseTracer2 extends the PhaseTracer code with bounce-action, nucleation, and gravitational wave spectrum calculations, and interfaces to dimensionally reduced effective field theories.

  6. Perturbative gravitational wave predictions for the real-scalar extended Standard Model

    hep-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At next-to-next-to-leading order, gravitational wave predictions for the real-scalar singlet extension of the Standard Model appear to converge for typical parameters, but break down for the strongest, observable signals.

Pith tools