Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fully Bayesian Forecasts with Evidence Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06942 v2 pith:MRZM4K6I submitted 2023-09-13 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.COgr-qc

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords forecastsbayesianabilityarriveassumptionscapablecomparisoncompeting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sensitivity forecasts inform the design of experiments and the direction of theoretical efforts. To arrive at representative results, Bayesian forecasts should marginalize their conclusions over uncertain parameters and noise realizations rather than picking fiducial values. However, this is typically computationally infeasible with current methods for forecasts of an experiment's ability to distinguish between competing models. We thus propose a novel simulation-based methodology capable of providing expedient and rigorous Bayesian model comparison forecasts without relying on restrictive assumptions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tests for model misspecification in simulation-based inference: from local distortions to global model checks

    astro-ph.IM 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A distortion-driven, simulation-based hypothesis-testing framework that unifies anomaly detection and model validation, with analytic links to matched filtering and chi-square tests.

Pith tools