REVIEW 1 cited by
Classical simulation of peaked shallow quantum circuits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
An $n$-qubit quantum circuit is said to be peaked if it has an output probability that is at least inverse-polynomially large as a function of $n$. We describe a classical algorithm with quasipolynomial runtime $n^{O(\log{n})}$ that approximately samples from the output distribution of a peaked constant-depth circuit. We give even faster algorithms for circuits composed of nearest-neighbor gates on a $D$-dimensional grid of qubits, with polynomial runtime $n^{O(1)}$ if $D=2$ and almost-polynomial runtime $n^{O(\log{\log{n}})}$ for $D>2$. Our sampling algorithms can be used to estimate output probabilities of shallow circuits to within a given inverse-polynomial additive error, improving previously known methods. As a simple application, we obtain a quasipolynomial algorithm to estimate the magnitude of the expected value of any Pauli observable in the output state of a shallow circuit (which may or may not be peaked). This is a dramatic improvement over the prior state-of-the-art algorithm which had an exponential scaling in $\sqrt{n}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Framework for Quantum Advantage
A framework defining quantum advantage as verifiable plus classically superior, with a conclusion that random circuit sampling is not yet a satisfactory path.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.