REVIEW 4 cited by
Distill to Delete: Unlearning in Graph Networks with Knowledge Distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Graph unlearning has emerged as a pivotal method to delete information from a pre-trained graph neural network (GNN). One may delete nodes, a class of nodes, edges, or a class of edges. An unlearning method enables the GNN model to comply with data protection regulations (i.e., the right to be forgotten), adapt to evolving data distributions, and reduce the GPU-hours carbon footprint by avoiding repetitive retraining. Existing partitioning and aggregation-based methods have limitations due to their poor handling of local graph dependencies and additional overhead costs. More recently, GNNDelete offered a model-agnostic approach that alleviates some of these issues. Our work takes a novel approach to address these challenges in graph unlearning through knowledge distillation, as it distills to delete in GNN (D2DGN). It is a model-agnostic distillation framework where the complete graph knowledge is divided and marked for retention and deletion. It performs distillation with response-based soft targets and feature-based node embedding while minimizing KL divergence. The unlearned model effectively removes the influence of deleted graph elements while preserving knowledge about the retained graph elements. D2DGN surpasses the performance of existing methods when evaluated on various real-world graph datasets by up to $43.1\%$ (AUC) in edge and node unlearning tasks. Other notable advantages include better efficiency, better performance in removing target elements, preservation of performance for the retained elements, and zero overhead costs. Notably, our D2DGN surpasses the state-of-the-art GNNDelete in AUC by $2.4\%$, improves membership inference ratio by $+1.3$, requires $10.2\times10^6$ fewer FLOPs per forward pass and up to $\mathbf{3.2}\times$ faster.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
OpenGU: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Unlearning
OpenGU is claimed as the first comprehensive benchmark for graph unlearning, integrating 16 methods, 37 datasets, and a 3x3 grid of tasks and unlearning requests, with empirical findings on effectiveness, efficiency, ...
-
Unlearning of Knowledge Graph Embedding via Preference Optimization
GraphDPO applies direct preference optimization to knowledge graph embedding unlearning, using out-boundary sampling and boundary recall to forget triples while retaining neighbors.
-
Unlearning Algorithmic Biases over Graphs
Graph unlearning repurposed as a training-free post-processing debiasing method, with correlation-based feature and degree-aware structural selection.
-
Toward Scalable Graph Unlearning: A Node Influence Maximization based Approach
The paper's NIM+SGU pipeline improves forgetting and preserves accuracy in graph unlearning by selecting high-influence nodes via propagation-based influence scores and fine-tuning on entity-specific losses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.