Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FroSSL: Frobenius Norm Minimization for Efficient Multiview Self-Supervised Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02903 v4 pith:DJ7ZLGBY submitted 2023-10-04 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords frosslapproachescovariancelearningavoidingcollapsecompetitiveeigenvalues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a popular paradigm for representation learning. Recent multiview methods can be classified as sample-contrastive, dimension-contrastive, or asymmetric network-based, with each family having its own approach to avoiding informational collapse. While these families converge to solutions of similar quality, it can be empirically shown that some methods are epoch-inefficient and require longer training to reach a target performance. Two main approaches to improving efficiency are covariance eigenvalue regularization and using more views. However, these two approaches are difficult to combine due to the computational complexity of computing eigenvalues. We present the objective function FroSSL which reconciles both approaches while avoiding eigendecomposition entirely. FroSSL works by minimizing covariance Frobenius norms to avoid collapse and minimizing mean-squared error to achieve augmentation invariance. We show that FroSSL reaches competitive accuracies more quickly than any other SSL method and provide theoretical and empirical support that this faster convergence is due to how FroSSL affects the eigenvalues of the embedding covariance matrices. We also show that FroSSL learns competitive representations on linear probe evaluation when used to train a ResNet-18 on several datasets, including STL-10, Tiny ImageNet, and ImageNet-100.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Planning vs Reasoning: Ablations to Test Capabilities of LoRA layers

    cs.AI 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    On GPT-2 hash tasks, LoRA layers improved a synthetic reasoning task more than a planning task, and the authors interpret this as evidence that reasoning is inherently low rank.

Pith tools