REVIEW 1 cited by
Metrology of weak quantum perturbations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We consider quantum systems with a Hamiltonian containing a weak perturbation i.e. $\boldsymbol{H=H_0} + \boldsymbol{\lambda} \cdot \boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$, $\boldsymbol{\lambda}= \{\lambda_1, \lambda_2,...\}$, $\boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$ $= \{H_1, H_2,...\}$, $\left|\boldsymbol{\lambda}\right| \ll 1$, and address situations where $\boldsymbol{\tilde{H}}$ is known but the values of the couplings $\boldsymbol{\lambda}$ are unknown, and should be determined by performing measurements on the system. We consider two scenarios: in the first one we assume that measurements are performed on a given stationary state of the system, e.g., the ground state, whereas in the second one an initial state is prepared and then measured after evolution. In both cases, we look for the optimal measurements to estimate the couplings and evaluate the ultimate limits to precision. In particular, we derive general results for one and two couplings, and analyze in details some specific qubit models. Our results indicates that dynamical estimation schemes may provide enhanced precision upon a suitable choice of the initial preparation and the interaction time.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMs
Chain-of-thought prompting degrades instruction-following accuracy on IFEval and ComplexBench across most tested models, and selective reasoning can partially recover the loss.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.