Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Consistent Distributed Ranking of Generative Models via Kernel Distances

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11714 v5 pith:2M7CBSSS submitted 2023-10-18 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords modelsrankingdistributedgenerativeclientsevaluationscorescentralized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ranking generative models based on the fidelity and diversity of their outputs is required to identify the best generator in a group of candidate generative AI models. To rank a group of models in a conventional centralized setting, a standard score is commonly evaluated for each involved model. The selection and design of reference-based evaluation scores have been extensively studied in centralized settings, where the reference samples are drawn from a single probability distribution. However, in practical scenarios including distributed learning contexts, reference samples are distributed across multiple clients, each potentially with a heterogeneous data distribution. In this work, we investigate the ranking of generative models in such distributed settings with heterogeneous data distributions across clients. We focus on the widely used family of kernel distance (KD) evaluation metrics. We prove that, for every kernel function, ranking models by the averaged KD scores of individual clients yields the same ordering as a centralized KD evaluation using the combined reference data from all the clients. We further extend our analysis to other popular metrics, including the Fr\'echet Distance (FD), for which the individual client scores could be insufficient for accurate model ranking. We present the numerical results of several experiments on standard image datasets and generative models to validate our theoretical findings regarding distributed ranking using various evaluation scores.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LAION-SG: An Enhanced Large-Scale Dataset for Training Complex Image-Text Models with Structural Annotations

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 540,005-image dataset with GPT-4o-produced scene graph annotations improves compositional text-to-image generation when used to fine-tune SDXL-based models.

  2. DiffPattern-Flex: Efficient Layout Pattern Generation via Discrete Diffusion

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DiffPattern-Flex generates DRC-clean VLSI layout patterns with a discrete diffusion topology model plus a white-box legalization solver, reporting diversity 11.713 and 100% legality on the ICCAD 2014 benchmark.

  3. TorchResist: Open-Source Differentiable Resist Simulator

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A differentiable, physics-based photoresist simulator with about twenty parameters beats threshold-based baselines on LithoBench while enabling gradient-based co-optimization.

Pith tools