REVIEW 2 cited by
Spacetime geometry from canonical spherical gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study covariant models for vacuum spherical gravity within a canonical setting. Starting from a general ansatz, we derive the most general family of Hamiltonian constraints that are quadratic in first-order and linear in second-order spatial derivatives of the triad variables, and obey certain specific covariance conditions. These conditions ensure that the dynamics generated by such family univocally defines a spacetime geometry, independently of gauge or coordinates choices. This analysis generalizes the Hamiltonian constraint of general relativity, though keeping intact the covariance of the theory, and leads to a rich variety of new geometries. We find that the resulting geometries depend on seven free functions of one scalar variable, and we study their generic features. By construction, there are no propagating degrees of freedom in the theory. However, we also show that it is possible to add matter to the system by simply following the usual minimal-coupling prescription, which leads to novel models to describe dynamical scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Dust shell in effective loop quantum black hole model
In a polymerized loop-quantum-gravity black hole model, a collapsing dust shell bounces and, for sufficiently heavy shells, follows a spacelike trajectory through the horizon, implying a finite horizon lifetime and a ...
-
Lessons for loop quantum gravity from emergent modified gravity
Emergent modified gravity rules out most proposed loop quantum gravity black-hole models and shows that mu0 and mu-bar holonomy schemes are canonically equivalent, so they are not physically distinct.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.