Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is MgB$_2$ a superconductor?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.04495 v3 pith:OHREE6LC submitted 2023-12-07 cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords modelauthorsdataexperimentalsuperconductorabsenceapplicationargue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Hirsch and Marsiglio, in their recent publication (J. Supercond. Nov. Mag. 35, 3141-3145 (2022)), assert that experimental data on the trapping of magnetic flux by hydrogen-rich compounds clearly demonstrate the absence of superconductivity in hydrides at high pressures. We argue that this assertion is incorrect, as it relies on the wrong model coupled with selective manipulations (hide/delete) of calculated datasets and ignores the reference measurements after the release of pressure. A critical examination of the authors' claim of having performed fitting of experimental data to the model reveals that, in fact, the authors conducted simulations where all free parameters were fixed. Importantly, an application of the Hirsch-Marsiglio model to MgB$_2$ leads to the conclusion that it is not a superconductor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reply to "Is $MgB_2$ a superconductor? Comment on "Evidence Against Superconductivity in Flux Trapping Experiments on Hydrides Under High Pressure" "

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Hirsch and Marsiglio rebut claims that their Bean-model analysis of trapped flux misrepresents the Meissner state, arguing the Comment plotted their equations outside their valid field range.

Pith tools