REVIEW 3 cited by
Radiative decays of X(3872) discriminate between the molecular and compact interpretations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Radiative decays X --> psi(1S) + gamma and X --> psi(2S) + gamma might be expected to have a ratio of branching fractions following the phase space volumes ratio. However data suggest the opposite, indicating a value for R=B(X --> psi^prime + gamma) / B(X --> psi +gamma) consistently larger than one. In this paper we present a calculation of R for both a compact Born-Oppenheimer cc-bar q-qbar state and a DD^* molecule. In the former case R~1 or larger is found, a value to be confronted with forthcoming high statistics data analyses. In the molecular picture, with D and D^* mesons described by the universal wave function used by Voloshin, Braaten and Kusunoki, we find that R would be of order 10^-2. A more precise experimental measure would be extremely helpful in clarifying the true nature of the X(3872).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
High-energy dynamics of QCD: Theoretical and phenomenological results
Real NLO corrections to the BFKL Higgs impact factor are derived with a physical top-quark mass, and updated tetraquark fragmentation functions are applied to predict rates at 14 and 100 TeV.
-
A short review on the compositeness of the $X(3872)$
Radiative decays and the LHCb line-shape data are incompatible with a purely molecular X(3872) and favor a compact or partially composite state, with a proposed molecular-amplitude fit for a decisive test.
-
$X(3872)$ and hidden charmed tetraquarks
A diquark-antidiquark quark model with parameters fitted to X(3872) and Tcc predicts hidden-charm tetraquark masses and tentatively assigns XYZ states.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.