Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification

As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2402.03686.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2402.03686 v3

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-12T16:49:58.085034Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-12T18:16:22.223912Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation addb34b6-c816-4ee5-8e07-a3c990d7528e · inbound

Unlocking Historical Clinical Trial Data with ALIGN: A Compositional Large Language Model System for Medical Coding cites this paper.

Unlocking Historical Clinical Trial Data with ALIGN: A Compositional Large Language Model System for Medical Coding Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification

Reference 30

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-12T16:49:58.206854Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-12T16:49:58.085034Z digest=sha256:8492d477580fe9615f7201514dc6b9532900af7c8570d2ad83311b30abafc94a

Observation 6cc44bb4-0e70-478d-be52-0675e98ec7cc · inbound

Where do LLMs Fall Short in CBT-Guided Affective Reasoning? cites this paper.

Where do LLMs Fall Short in CBT-Guided Affective Reasoning? Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification

Reference 28

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T06:23:49.752475Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-07-12T06:23:49.752475Z digest=sha256:1b26b4637ebac1d576cdb7e6cd38785cde66cf162c4bc288c0e2e19ec8c0bad5