Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analysis of Linear Mode Connectivity via Permutation-Based Weight Matching: With Insights into Other Permutation Search Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04051 v5 pith:ZNCXF6YE submitted 2024-02-06 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords singularmodelsmodelpermutationsvectorsdistancelinearmatching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recently, Ainsworth et al. showed that using weight matching (WM) to minimize the $L^2$ distance in a permutation search of model parameters effectively identifies permutations that satisfy linear mode connectivity (LMC), where the loss along a linear path between two independently trained models with different seeds remains nearly constant. This paper analyzes LMC using WM, which is useful for understanding stochastic gradient descent's effectiveness and its application in areas like model merging. We first empirically show that permutations found by WM do not significantly reduce the $L^2$ distance between two models, and the occurrence of LMC is not merely due to distance reduction by WM itself. We then demonstrate that permutations can change the directions of the singular vectors, but not the singular values, of the weight matrices in each layer. This finding shows that permutations found by WM primarily align the directions of singular vectors associated with large singular values across models. This alignment brings the singular vectors with large singular values, which determine the model's functionality, closer between the original and merged models, allowing the merged model to retain functionality similar to the original models, thereby satisfying LMC. This paper also analyzes activation matching (AM) in terms of singular vectors and finds that the principle of AM is likely the same as that of WM. Finally, we analyze the difference between WM and the straight-through estimator (STE), a dataset-dependent permutation search method, and show that WM can be more advantageous than STE in achieving LMC among three or more models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Speculate, then Collaborate: Fusing Knowledge of Language Models during Decoding

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CoSD fuses two LLMs at decoding time: it keeps the draft model's tokens unless a confidence rule or a decision tree over token probabilities says the assistant model's token is better.

Pith tools