Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Quantum Algorithm Exploration using Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.08985 v1 pith:7EZXICYX submitted 2024-02-14 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords benchmarkperformancetimealgorithmerrorgatemitigationquantum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The QED-C suite of Application-Oriented Benchmarks provides the ability to gauge performance characteristics of quantum computers as applied to real-world applications. Its benchmark programs sweep over a range of problem sizes and inputs, capturing key performance metrics related to the quality of results, total time of execution, and quantum gate resources consumed. In this manuscript, we investigate challenges in broadening the relevance of this benchmarking methodology to applications of greater complexity. First, we introduce a method for improving landscape coverage by varying algorithm parameters systematically, exemplifying this functionality in a new scalable HHL linear equation solver benchmark. Second, we add a VQE implementation of a Hydrogen Lattice simulation to the QED-C suite, and introduce a methodology for analyzing the result quality and run-time cost trade-off. We observe a decrease in accuracy with increased number of qubits, but only a mild increase in the execution time. Third, unique characteristics of a supervised machine-learning classification application are explored as a benchmark to gauge the extensibility of the framework to new classes of application. Applying this to a binary classification problem revealed the increase in training time required for larger anzatz circuits, and the significant classical overhead. Fourth, we add methods to include optimization and error mitigation in the benchmarking workflow which allows us to: identify a favourable trade off between approximate gate synthesis and gate noise; observe the benefits of measurement error mitigation and a form of deterministic error mitigation algorithm; and to contrast the improvement with the resulting time overhead. Looking ahead, we discuss how the benchmark framework can be instrumental in facilitating the exploration of algorithmic options and their impact on performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Clifford Volume and Free Fermion Volume: Complementary Scalable Benchmarks for Quantum Computers

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two new classically verifiable benchmark scores, Clifford Volume and Free Fermion Volume, are defined, simulated under noise, and Clifford Volume is measured on the Quantinuum H2-1 device as 34 qubits.

  2. QB Ground State Energy Estimation Benchmark

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new ground-state energy estimation benchmark rates SHCI, DMRG, and double-factorized QPE, reporting near-universal SHCI solvability from an ML extrapolation that its own empirical table only partially supports.

Pith tools