REVIEW 6 cited by
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: likelihood-free, simulation-based $w$CDM inference with neural compression of weak-lensing map statistics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present simulation-based cosmological $w$CDM inference using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak-lensing maps, via neural data compression of weak-lensing map summary statistics: power spectra, peak counts, and direct map-level compression/inference with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Using simulation-based inference, also known as likelihood-free or implicit inference, we use forward-modelled mock data to estimate posterior probability distributions of unknown parameters. This approach allows all statistical assumptions and uncertainties to be propagated through the forward-modelled mock data; these include sky masks, non-Gaussian shape noise, shape measurement bias, source galaxy clustering, photometric redshift uncertainty, intrinsic galaxy alignments, non-Gaussian density fields, neutrinos, and non-linear summary statistics. We include a series of tests to validate our inference results. This paper also describes the Gower Street simulation suite: 791 full-sky PKDGRAV dark matter simulations, with cosmological model parameters sampled with a mixed active-learning strategy, from which we construct over 3000 mock DES lensing data sets. For $w$CDM inference, for which we allow $-1<w<-\frac{1}{3}$, our most constraining result uses power spectra combined with map-level (CNN) inference. Using gravitational lensing data only, this map-level combination gives $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.283^{+0.020}_{-0.027}$, ${S_8 = 0.804^{+0.025}_{-0.017}}$, and $w < -0.80$ (with a 68 per cent credible interval); compared to the power spectrum inference, this is more than a factor of two improvement in dark energy parameter ($\Omega_{\rm DE}, w$) precision.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
DECADE+DES Y3 Weak Lensing Mass Map: A 13,000 deg$^2$ View of Cosmic Structure from 270 Million Galaxies
A 13,000 square degree weak lensing mass map, the largest to date, with a first demonstration of filament detection from lensing alone.
-
Cosmology from a joint analysis of second and third order shear statistics with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 data
The body is a DES-Y3 analysis showing a 111% figure-of-merit gain from adding aperture-mass skewness to two-point shear, but the abstract's HSC-Y3 headline numbers do not appear anywhere in the text.
-
Computing Nonlinear Power Spectra Across Dynamical Dark Energy Model Space with Neural ODEs
A neural ODE trained only on LambdaCDM spectra predicts nonlinear matter power spectra to about 4 percent accuracy for smooth w(z) dark energy models, pending stronger validation.
-
Learning Balanced Field Summaries of the Large-Scale Structure with the Neural Field Scattering Transform
On simulated weak lensing maps, the Neural Field Scattering Transform with trained filters improves constraints on sigma_8 and w by 6-11% and posterior density by about 17% over the standard Wavelet Scattering Transform.
-
Comment on "An implementation of neural simulation-based inference for parameter estimation in ATLAS''
The double-bootstrapping procedure used in the ATLAS NSBI analysis estimates only uncertainty conditional on the fixed simulated dataset, and therefore misses the Monte Carlo statistical uncertainty.
-
Controlled Tension Forecasting: Quantifying Cross-Probe Biases in $\omega_0\omega_a$CDM
Controlled mock analyses show that cross-probe calibration tensions — in matter density, H0, supernova brightness, or sound horizon — can fake 3–10σ apparent dynamical-dark-energy signals while the true cosmology is ΛCDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.