REVIEW 1 cited by
What is Wrong with End-to-End Learning for Phase Retrieval?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
For nonlinear inverse problems that are prevalent in imaging science, symmetries in the forward model are common. When data-driven deep learning approaches are used to solve such problems, these intrinsic symmetries can cause substantial learning difficulties. In this paper, we explain how such difficulties arise and, more importantly, how to overcome them by preprocessing the training set before any learning, i.e., symmetry breaking. We take far-field phase retrieval (FFPR), which is central to many areas of scientific imaging, as an example and show that symmetric breaking can substantially improve data-driven learning. We also formulate the mathematical principle of symmetry breaking.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Phase Retrieval of Highly Strained Bragg Coherent Diffraction Patterns using Supervised Convolutional Neural Network
A supervised 3D U-Net predicts the reciprocal-space phase of highly strained Bragg coherent diffraction patterns, and inverse Fourier transform plus error reduction recovers objects that standard phase retrieval misses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.