REVIEW 3 cited by
Revisiting Stability in New General Relativity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the degrees of freedom in New General Relativity -- flat and metric compatible family of theories -- around the Minkowski background in a gauge invariant manner. First, we confirm the decoupling case, in which the theory reduces to linearized gravity plus a massless KR field. We then show that, unless they vanish, the vector modes of this theory will be unstable. In addition, we find two new branches of the theories, which are instability-free and propagate linearly two tensor modes and in one of the cases also a massless scalar field. This shows that while the generic theory is ill-behaved, there are three possible realizations of instability-free cases, in contradiction to the previous literature, which states that there is only one healthy theory in addition to general relativity.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Cosmological Perturbation in New General Relativity: Propagating mode from the violation of local Lorentz invariance
In New General Relativity on a flat expanding universe, the propagating spectrum is computed for all nine types, with Type 3 carrying five stable tensor, scalar, and vector modes.
-
Geometric formulation of $k$-essence and late-time acceleration
Integrable vectorial nonmetricity gravity is shown to be equivalent to purely kinetic quadratic k-essence, which fits late-time data as well as ΛCDM.
-
Traversable Wormhole Solutions in massive $F(T)$ gravity
In massive F(T) gravity, exact traversable wormhole solutions exist whose throats are supported by the graviton mass term, with matter that satisfies standard energy conditions in selected parameter ranges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.