Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Language Models as Critical Thinking Tools: A Case Study of Philosophers

As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2404.04516.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2404.04516 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T15:40:08.999643Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-07T00:52:41.971831Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation eb516f75-31cd-4173-ba58-6917331d5cbb · inbound

What Does Success Look Like? Catalyzing Meeting Intentionality with AI-Assisted Prospective Reflection cites this paper.

What Does Success Look Like? Catalyzing Meeting Intentionality with AI-Assisted Prospective Reflection Language Models as Critical Thinking Tools: A Case Study of Philosophers

Reference 171

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:40:08.999643Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T15:40:08.999643Z digest=sha256:87c20a0d27953b064f2cb968f24a77b6eaaffa697b0ea2bd051258f5f029fc83

Observation a9e52182-4906-4b26-b01f-719c94957c28 · inbound

Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents cites this paper.

Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents Language Models as Critical Thinking Tools: A Case Study of Philosophers

Reference 44

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T00:52:41.978391Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T00:52:41.935750Z digest=sha256:03d2908e595eadc016e97f16f792a62aa271bc3a3a2c948a32318230dbb74059