Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14655 v2 pith:RQ2AC355 submitted 2024-05-23 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningmulti-turnalgorithmfeedbackhumanpreferencereinforcementenvironment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PAG: Multi-Turn Reinforced LLM Self-Correction with Policy as Generative Verifier

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-turn reinforcement learning framework trains a single LLM to both solve math problems and verify its own solutions, revising only when its verifier finds a mistake.

  2. Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Under the assumption that the response reward equals the discounted sum of token rewards, response-level rewards suffice for unbiased token-level policy gradients in LLMs.

  3. Robust pid sliding mode control for dc servo motor speed control

    eess.SY 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    An abstract-only claim that SMC-PID outperforms PID for DC servo motor speed on the CE110 trainer; the submitted body text is an unrelated paper, so the result is unverifiable.

Pith tools