Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Bits and Bandits: Quantifying the Regret-Information Trade-off

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16581 v4 pith:2NFEALEN submitted 2024-05-26 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords regretboundsinformationagentaccumulateslowerbitsmeasured
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In many sequential decision problems, an agent performs a repeated task. He then suffers regret and obtains information that he may use in the following rounds. However, sometimes the agent may also obtain information and avoid suffering regret by querying external sources. We study the trade-off between the information an agent accumulates and the regret it suffers. We invoke information-theoretic methods for obtaining regret lower bounds, that also allow us to easily re-derive several known lower bounds. We introduce the first Bayesian regret lower bounds that depend on the information an agent accumulates. We also prove regret upper bounds using the amount of information the agent accumulates. These bounds show that information measured in bits, can be traded off for regret, measured in reward. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of these bounds in improving the performance of a question-answering task with large language models, allowing us to obtain valuable insights.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Information Routing across Batch Boundaries: Memory--Batch Tradeoffs in Lipschitz Bandits

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For W at least C_d log(eT), minimax pseudo-regret in Lipschitz bandits is, up to logarithmic factors, the maximum of the sequential rate, a new memory-batch penalty T^((d+2)/(d+3)) (1+(B-1)W)^(-1/(d(d+3))), and a batc...

Pith tools