Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07529 v5 pith:BQQSHGSO submitted 2024-06-11 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords mergingmodelparetotasksfrontmodelstrade-offsamortized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model merging has emerged as an effective approach to combine multiple single-task models into a multitask model. This process typically involves computing a weighted average of the model parameters without any additional training. Existing model-merging methods focus on enhancing average task accuracy. However, interference and conflicts between the objectives of different tasks can lead to trade-offs during the merging process. In real-world applications, a set of solutions with various trade-offs can be more informative, helping practitioners make decisions based on diverse preferences. In this paper, we introduce a novel and low-compute algorithm, Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Front (MAP). MAP efficiently identifies a Pareto set of scaling coefficients for merging multiple models, reflecting the trade-offs involved. It amortizes the substantial computational cost of evaluations needed to estimate the Pareto front by using quadratic approximation surrogate models derived from a pre-selected set of scaling coefficients. Experimental results on vision and natural language processing tasks demonstrate that MAP can accurately identify the Pareto front, providing practitioners with flexible solutions to balance competing task objectives. We also introduce Bayesian MAP for scenarios with a relatively low number of tasks and Nested MAP for situations with a high number of tasks, further reducing the computational cost of evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StatsMerging: Statistics-Guided Model Merging via Task-Specific Teacher Distillation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    StatsMerging predicts per-layer merging coefficients from weight statistics and teacher pseudo-labels, achieving 94.5% average accuracy across eight vision tasks, 5.1 points above WEMoE.

Pith tools