REVIEW 2 cited by
When does Self-Prediction help? Understanding Auxiliary Tasks in Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate the impact of auxiliary learning tasks such as observation reconstruction and latent self-prediction on the representation learning problem in reinforcement learning. We also study how they interact with distractions and observation functions in the MDP. We provide a theoretical analysis of the learning dynamics of observation reconstruction, latent self-prediction, and TD learning in the presence of distractions and observation functions under linear model assumptions. With this formalization, we are able to explain why latent-self prediction is a helpful \emph{auxiliary task}, while observation reconstruction can provide more useful features when used in isolation. Our empirical analysis shows that the insights obtained from our learning dynamics framework predicts the behavior of these loss functions beyond the linear model assumption in non-linear neural networks. This reinforces the usefulness of the linear model framework not only for theoretical analysis, but also practical benefit for applied problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Dark Room in the Reward Channel: Dense Prediction Rewards Collapse GRPO-Trained LLM Agents -- and The Channel, Not the Content, Decides What Works
A potential-based prediction reward collapses GRPO-trained LLM agents into a predictable 'dark room' state, and the collapse is caused by GRPO's std normalization rather than by the reward's magnitude.
-
Understanding Behavioral Metric Learning: A Large-Scale Study on Distracting Reinforcement Learning Environments
Across noisy DeepMind Control tasks, explicit bisimulation-metric losses add little denoising benefit beyond plain self-prediction and feature normalization, which dominate performance.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.