Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

When does Self-Prediction help? Understanding Auxiliary Tasks in Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17718 v1 pith:MTEHG53O submitted 2024-06-25 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningobservationanalysisauxiliaryfunctionslinearmodelreconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of auxiliary learning tasks such as observation reconstruction and latent self-prediction on the representation learning problem in reinforcement learning. We also study how they interact with distractions and observation functions in the MDP. We provide a theoretical analysis of the learning dynamics of observation reconstruction, latent self-prediction, and TD learning in the presence of distractions and observation functions under linear model assumptions. With this formalization, we are able to explain why latent-self prediction is a helpful \emph{auxiliary task}, while observation reconstruction can provide more useful features when used in isolation. Our empirical analysis shows that the insights obtained from our learning dynamics framework predicts the behavior of these loss functions beyond the linear model assumption in non-linear neural networks. This reinforces the usefulness of the linear model framework not only for theoretical analysis, but also practical benefit for applied problems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Dark Room in the Reward Channel: Dense Prediction Rewards Collapse GRPO-Trained LLM Agents -- and The Channel, Not the Content, Decides What Works

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A potential-based prediction reward collapses GRPO-trained LLM agents into a predictable 'dark room' state, and the collapse is caused by GRPO's std normalization rather than by the reward's magnitude.

  2. Understanding Behavioral Metric Learning: A Large-Scale Study on Distracting Reinforcement Learning Environments

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Across noisy DeepMind Control tasks, explicit bisimulation-metric losses add little denoising benefit beyond plain self-prediction and feature normalization, which dominate performance.

Pith tools