Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19380 v4 pith:PI3BQH4D submitted 2024-06-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords tabulardatasetsevaluationbenchmarksdatatabredlearningsplits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in machine learning research drive progress in real-world applications. To ensure this progress, it is important to understand the potential pitfalls on the way from a novel method's success on academic benchmarks to its practical deployment. In this work, we analyze existing tabular benchmarks and find two common characteristics of tabular data in typical industrial applications that are underrepresented in the datasets usually used for evaluation in the literature. First, in real-world deployment scenarios, distribution of data often changes over time. To account for this distribution drift, time-based train/test splits should be used in evaluation. However, popular tabular datasets often lack timestamp metadata to enable such evaluation. Second, a considerable portion of datasets in production settings stem from extensive data acquisition and feature engineering pipelines. This can have an impact on the absolute and relative number of predictive, uninformative, and correlated features compared to academic datasets. In this work, we aim to understand how recent research advances in tabular deep learning transfer to these underrepresented conditions. To this end, we introduce TabReD -- a collection of eight industry-grade tabular datasets. We reassess a large number of tabular ML models and techniques on TabReD. We demonstrate that evaluation on time-based data splits leads to different methods ranking, compared to evaluation on random splits, which are common in current benchmarks. Furthermore, simple MLP-like architectures and GBDT show the best results on the TabReD datasets, while other methods are less effective in the new setting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MultiTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Multi-Dimensional Evaluation in Tabular Domains

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A regime-stratified benchmark of 196 tabular datasets shows that model rankings depend strongly on dataset characteristics such as sample size, feature correlation, and label imbalance.

  2. Ethics through the Facets of Artificial Intelligence

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The author introduces three facets of AI (scientific, technological, sociotechnical imaginary) and a three-layer responsibility framework for ethical assessment, without providing an executable specification.

Pith tools