Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CSPBench: a benchmark and critical evaluation of Crystal Structure Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00733 v1 pith:WKMFXNW6 submitted 2024-06-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords algorithmsbenchmarkperformancestructurescrystalglobalevaluatepotentials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is now increasingly used in discovering novel materials with applications in diverse industries. However, despite decades of developments and significant progress in this area, there lacks a set of well-defined benchmark dataset, quantitative performance metrics, and studies that evaluate the status of the field. We aim to fill this gap by introducing a CSP benchmark suite with 180 test structures along with our recently implemented CSP performance metric set. We benchmark a collection of 13 state-of-the-art (SOTA) CSP algorithms including template-based CSP algorithms, conventional CSP algorithms based on DFT calculations and global search such as CALYPSO, CSP algorithms based on machine learning (ML) potentials and global search, and distance matrix based CSP algorithms. Our results demonstrate that the performance of the current CSP algorithms is far from being satisfactory. Most algorithms cannot even identify the structures with the correct space groups except for the template-based algorithms when applied to test structures with similar templates. We also find that the ML potential based CSP algorithms are now able to achieve competitive performances compared to the DFT-based algorithms. These CSP algorithms' performance is strongly determined by the quality of the neural potentials as well as the global optimization algorithms. Our benchmark suite comes with a comprehensive open-source codebase and 180 well-selected benchmark crystal structures, making it convenient to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of CSP algorithms from future studies. All the code and benchmark data are available at https://github.com/usccolumbia/cspbenchmark

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative and multimodal AI for materials prediction and design: Progress, challenges, and perspectives

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative and multimodal AI can propose compositionally new materials, but a three-level novelty taxonomy shows current evidence supports only structural novelty, not physical or deployment novelty.

  2. Polymorphism Crystal Structure Prediction with Adaptive Space Group Diversity Control

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-objective genetic algorithm with adaptive space group diversity control improves polymorphic and regular crystal structure prediction over two prior GA/ML baselines.

Pith tools