REVIEW 2 cited by
Complete Self-Testing of a System of Remote Superconducting Qubits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Self-testing protocols enable the certification of quantum systems in a device-independent manner, i.e. without knowledge of the inner workings of the quantum devices under test. Here, we demonstrate this high standard for characterization routines with superconducting circuits, a prime platform for building large-scale quantum computing systems. We first develop the missing theory allowing for the self-testing of Pauli measurements. We then self-test Bell pair generation and measurements at the same time, performing a complete self-test in a system composed of two entangled superconducting circuits operated at a separation of 30 meters. In an experiment based on 17 million trials, we measure an average CHSH (Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt) S-value of 2.236. Without relying on additional assumptions on the experimental setup, we certify an average Bell state fidelity of at least 58.9% and an average measurement fidelity of at least 89.5% in a device-independent manner, both with 99% confidence. This enables applications in the field of distributed quantum computing and communication with superconducting circuits, such as delegated quantum computing.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Device-Independent Randomness Amplification
By running 1.34 billion loophole-free Bell trials with biased public inputs, the authors extracted 20,431,465 bits certified ε-random with ε=10^-12.
-
Remote entanglement generation via enhanced quantum state transfer
A zig-zag frequency pattern suppresses population on intermediate qubits and reduces error in remote Bell state generation on a superconducting processor.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.