REVIEW 1 cited by
Field Redefinitions in Classical Field Theory with some Quantum Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In quantum field theories, field redefinitions are often employed to remove redundant operators in the Lagrangian, making calculations simpler and physics more evident. This technique requires some care regarding, among other things, the choice of observables, the range of applicability, and the appearance and disappearance of solutions of the equations of motion (EOM). Many of these issues can already be studied at the classical level, which is the focus of this work. We highlight the importance of selecting appropriate observables and initial/boundary conditions to ensure the physical invariance of solutions. A classical analogue to the Lehmann-Symanzik-Zimmermann (LSZ) formula is presented, confirming that some observables remain independent of field variables without tracking redefinitions. Additionally, we address, with an example, the limitations of non-invertible field redefinitions, particularly with non-perturbative objects like solitons, and discuss their implications for classical and quantum field theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Non-injective field redefinitions and quantum inequivalence in scalar theories
Pulling a free massive multiplet through a non-injective polynomial field redefinition with unit Jacobian yields a theory that is exactly free on every local sheet but globally not unitarily equivalent to a free theory.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.