REVIEW 2 cited by
Fault-tolerant optical interconnects for neutral-atom arrays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We analyze the use of photonic links to enable large-scale fault-tolerant connectivity of locally error-corrected modules based on neutral atom arrays. Our approach makes use of recent theoretical results showing the robustness of surface codes to boundary noise and combines recent experimental advances in atom array quantum computing with logical qubits with optical quantum networking techniques. We find the conditions for fault-tolerance can be achieved with local two-qubit Rydberg gate and non-local Bell pair errors below 1% and 10%, respectively, without requiring distillation or space-time overheads. Realizing the interconnects with a lens, a single optical cavity, or an array of cavities enables a Bell pair generation rate in the 1-50 MHz range. When directly interfacing logical qubits, this rate translates to error-correction cycles in the 25-2000 kHz range, satisfying all requirements for fault tolerance and in the upper range fast enough for 100 kHz logical clock cycles.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fault-Tolerant Logical Operations and Efficient State Preparation in Modular Quantum Architectures with Noisy Interfaces
Noisy modular interfaces tolerate ~10× higher error than local gates for lattice-surgery CNOTs, and distributed logical GHZ ancilla cost reduces to a spanning-tree vertex cover.
-
Designing Fault-Tolerant Blind Quantum Computation
A hybrid matter-photon architecture for blind quantum computing offloads error correction to the server and is claimed to raise the communication error threshold to up to 10% with linear photonic overhead.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.