Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Losses resistant verification of quantum non-Gaussian photon statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.11590 v1 pith:S22W3NFM submitted 2024-08-21 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumlossesnon-gaussianaddressdetectorinefficiencylightoptical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum non-Gaussian states of light have fundamental properties that are essential for a multitude of applications in quantum technology. However, many of these features are difficult to detect using standard criteria due to optical losses and detector inefficiency. As the statistics of light are unknown, the loss correction on the data is unreliable, despite the fact that the losses can be precisely measured. To address this issue, we employ a loss-mitigated verification technique utilising quantum non-Gaussian witnesses, which incorporate the known optical losses and detector inefficiency into their derivation. This approach allows us to address the considerable challenge of experimentally demonstrating unheralded quantum non-Gaussian states of single photons and photon pairs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Quantum Non-Gaussianity Criterion Based on Photon Correlations $g^{(2)}$ and $g^{(3)}$

    quant-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new sufficient criterion certifies quantum non-Gaussianity from g2 and g3 alone: observing sqrt(g3) + 3 sqrt(g2) < 2 proves the state is not a mixture of Gaussian states; a quantum-dot source violates it by 0.174(13) vs 2.

Pith tools