Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal ablation for interpretability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09951 v1 pith:VGTYJQXR submitted 2024-09-16 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords componentablationimportanceinterpretabilitymodelmeasuringoa-basedoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interpretability studies often involve tracing the flow of information through machine learning models to identify specific model components that perform relevant computations for tasks of interest. Prior work quantifies the importance of a model component on a particular task by measuring the impact of performing ablation on that component, or simulating model inference with the component disabled. We propose a new method, optimal ablation (OA), and show that OA-based component importance has theoretical and empirical advantages over measuring importance via other ablation methods. We also show that OA-based component importance can benefit several downstream interpretability tasks, including circuit discovery, localization of factual recall, and latent prediction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Unified Attribution in Explainable AI, Data-Centric AI, and Mechanistic Interpretability

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A position paper unifying feature, data, and component attribution under three shared techniques, perturbation, gradient, and linear approximation, and proposing cross-attribution research directions.

Pith tools