Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optical galaxy cluster mock catalogs with realistic projection effects: Validations with the SDSS clusters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02497 v2 pith:2AEVXPPR submitted 2024-10-03 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords modelclusterprojectiongalaxiesclustersrichnessgaussianmembers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Galaxy clusters identified in optical imaging surveys suffer from projection effects: Physically unassociated galaxies along a cluster's line of sight can be counted as its members and boost the observed richness (the number of cluster members). To model the impact of projection on cluster cosmology analyses, we apply a halo occupation distribution model to N-body simulations to simulate the red galaxies contributing to cluster members, and we use the number of galaxies in a cylinder along the line of sight (counts in cylinders) to model the impact of projection on cluster richness. We compare three projection models: uniform, quadratic, and Gaussian, and we convert between them by matching their effective cylinder volumes. We validate our mock catalogs using SDSS redMaPPer clusters' data vectors, including counts vs. richness, stacked lensing signal, spectroscopic redshift distribution of member galaxies, and richness remeasured on a redshift grid. We find the former two are insensitive to the projection model, while the latter two favor a quadratic projection model with a width of approximately 180 Mpc/h (equivalent to the volume of a uniform model with a width of 100 Mpc/h and a Gaussian model with a width of 110 Mpc/h, or a Gaussian redshift error of 0.04). Our framework provides an efficient and flexible way to model optical cluster data vectors, paving the way for a simulation-based joint analysis for clusters, galaxies, and shear.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relationship between 2D and 3D Galaxy Stellar Mass and Correlations with Halo Mass

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In IllustrisTNG simulations, 2D projected outer stellar mass is as good as 3D outer stellar mass at tracing halo mass and shows no projection bias in galaxy-galaxy lensing.

Pith tools