REVIEW 3 cited by
Constraints on Power Law and Exponential models in $f(Q)$ Gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we observationally test the \( f(Q) \) gravity model at both background and perturbation levels using Pantheon$^+$, Hubble measurements, and Redshift Space Distortion Data. We obtain the best-fit parameters by solving numerically the modified Friedmann equations for two distinct cosmological models of \( f(Q) \) gravity namely the Power law and Exponential models. This involves performing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis for these specific forms of \( f(Q) \). To evaluate the statistical significance of the \( f(Q) \) gravity models, we use the Bayesian and corrected Akaike Information Criteria. Our results indicate that the Exponential model in \( f(Q) \) gravity is statistically favored over both the Power-law model and the \( \Lambda \)CDM model.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Apparent horizon thermodynamics in an exponential $f(Q)$ gravity model
In an exponential f(Q) model, apparent-horizon entropy gains exponentially suppressed corrections to the area law, and the generalized second law excludes parameter values b>0.26 in the future-redshift region.
-
Constraints on Logarithmic Model Extensions of Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity
Two new logarithmic f(Q) gravity models fit current cosmological data and predict contrasting, testable deviations in the effective gravitational coupling and gravitational-wave damping.
-
Dynamical Dark Energy or Modified Gravity? Signatures in Gravitational Wave Propagation
Reconstructing the dark energy density from DESI BAO and DESyr5 supernovae, then recasting it as f(Q) gravity, predicts a low-redshift gravitational wave damping ν≈0.18 (≳2σ from GR) only for the DESyr5 dataset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.