REVIEW 2 cited by
P-time Algorithms for Typical #EO Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this article, we study the computational complexity of counting weighted Eulerian orientations, denoted as \#\textsf{EO}. This problem is considered a pivotal scenario in the complexity classification for \textsf{Holant}, a counting framework of great significance. Our results consist of three parts. First, we prove a complexity dichotomy theorem for \#\textsf{EO} defined by a set of binary and quaternary signatures, which generalizes the previous dichotomy for the six-vertex model. Second, we prove a dichotomy for \#\textsf{EO} defined by a set of so-called pure signatures, which possess the closure property under gadget construction. Finally, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for \#\textsf{EO} defined by specific rebalancing signatures, which extends the algorithm for pure signatures to a broader range of problems, including \#\textsf{EO} defined by non-pure signatures such as $f_{40}$. We also construct a signature $f_{56}$ that is not rebalancing, and whether $\#\textsf{EO}(f_{56})$ is computable in polynomial time remains open.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From an odd arity signature to a Holant dichotomy
Complex-valued Holant with a non-trivial odd-arity signature is classified: every instance is either #P-hard or in FPNP.
-
The $\text{FP}^\text{NP}$ versus #P dichotomy for #EO
Every complex-weighted Eulerian orientation counting problem is either #P-hard or solvable in polynomial time with an NP oracle, giving the first comprehensive classification for #EO.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.