Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 5 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.11594.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T22:13:04.887831Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-18T03:35:50.526763Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation af9711ed-856e-4e79-95df-f95c0051aa06 · inbound
A Survey of Calibration Process for Black-Box LLMs cites this paper.
A Survey of Calibration Process for Black-Box LLMs Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 12
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-11T13:48:40.102166Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f4cad87c-1e69-4c3e-baf0-c9f4ffad7ec2 · inbound
A Case Study Investigating the Role of Generative AI in Quality Evaluations of Epics in Agile Software Development cites this paper.
A Case Study Investigating the Role of Generative AI in Quality Evaluations of Epics in Agile Software Development Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 74
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T22:13:04.887831Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 01c1984b-176b-4dd4-8e64-63fba250c49f · inbound
Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworks cites this paper.
Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworks Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-18T03:35:50.530335Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 00d28e57-a6e8-4d3f-9c50-454595b1038e · inbound
Diagnosing the Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge via Item Response Theory cites this paper.
Diagnosing the Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge via Item Response Theory Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T06:08:26.735504Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 73d6154b-b99d-41ee-8d98-2e2dcef72e02 · inbound
VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluation cites this paper.
VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluation Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 35
- Resolution
- metadata mismatch
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T23:31:17.371041Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.