Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

TSFM-Bench: A Comprehensive and Unified Benchmark of Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.11802 v6 pith:BYDY7L2K submitted 2024-10-15 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords tsfmsseriestimetsfm-benchdataevaluationforecastingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time Series Forecasting (TSF) is key functionality in numerous fields, such as financial investment, weather services, and energy management. Although increasingly capable TSF methods occur, many of them require domain-specific data collection and model training and do not generalize well when applied in other domains. Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) that are pre-trained on massive heterogeneous time series data aim to overcome these limitations. The prospects for generalizability have spurred the development of a new generation of TSFMs. This study proposes a benchmark, TSFM-Bench, to facilitate comprehensive and unified evaluation of TSFMs. TSFM-Bench covers a wide range of TSFMs, including those based on large language models and those pre-trained on time series data. TSFM-Bench supports multiple forecasting scenarios, including zero-shot, few-shot, and full-shot, enabling assessment across the full range of adaptation strategies. TSFM-Bench also provides a standardized experimental protocols for critical evaluation processes such as dataset splitting, loading, normalization, and few-shot sampling, facilitating consistency and fairness. We report on an extensive evaluation of TSFMs across a diverse range of datasets spanning multiple domains and exhibiting varied statistical characteristics. Specifically, we identify pros and cons and inherent limitations of existing TSFMs, and we propose potential directions for new model designs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forecasting Realized Volatility with Time Series Foundation Models: A Comparison with Econometric Benchmarks

    q-fin.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Zero-shot time series foundation models largely fail to beat econometric benchmarks for realized volatility forecasting, with only TTM achieving a narrow, calibration-driven edge.

  2. ARIES: Relation Assessment and Model Recommendation for Deep Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ARIES shows that deep forecasting models have consistent performance preferences tied to time series properties, and uses those preferences to recommend models for new datasets.

  3. ADFormer: Aggregation Differential Transformer for Passenger Demand Forecasting

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ADFormer applies differential attention plus cluster-based spatial and temporal aggregation to passenger demand forecasting, reporting the best MAE and RMSE on most of nine test settings.

Pith tools