REVIEW 3 cited by
TSFM-Bench: A Comprehensive and Unified Benchmark of Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Time Series Forecasting (TSF) is key functionality in numerous fields, such as financial investment, weather services, and energy management. Although increasingly capable TSF methods occur, many of them require domain-specific data collection and model training and do not generalize well when applied in other domains. Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) that are pre-trained on massive heterogeneous time series data aim to overcome these limitations. The prospects for generalizability have spurred the development of a new generation of TSFMs. This study proposes a benchmark, TSFM-Bench, to facilitate comprehensive and unified evaluation of TSFMs. TSFM-Bench covers a wide range of TSFMs, including those based on large language models and those pre-trained on time series data. TSFM-Bench supports multiple forecasting scenarios, including zero-shot, few-shot, and full-shot, enabling assessment across the full range of adaptation strategies. TSFM-Bench also provides a standardized experimental protocols for critical evaluation processes such as dataset splitting, loading, normalization, and few-shot sampling, facilitating consistency and fairness. We report on an extensive evaluation of TSFMs across a diverse range of datasets spanning multiple domains and exhibiting varied statistical characteristics. Specifically, we identify pros and cons and inherent limitations of existing TSFMs, and we propose potential directions for new model designs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Forecasting Realized Volatility with Time Series Foundation Models: A Comparison with Econometric Benchmarks
Zero-shot time series foundation models largely fail to beat econometric benchmarks for realized volatility forecasting, with only TTM achieving a narrow, calibration-driven edge.
-
ARIES: Relation Assessment and Model Recommendation for Deep Time Series Forecasting
ARIES shows that deep forecasting models have consistent performance preferences tied to time series properties, and uses those preferences to recommend models for new datasets.
-
ADFormer: Aggregation Differential Transformer for Passenger Demand Forecasting
ADFormer applies differential attention plus cluster-based spatial and temporal aggregation to passenger demand forecasting, reporting the best MAE and RMSE on most of nine test settings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.