Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adaptive Data Optimization: Dynamic Sample Selection with Scaling Laws

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.11820 v1 pith:GSXL4EQN submitted 2024-10-15 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datamodelscomputationallawsscalingacrossadaptivedifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The composition of pretraining data is a key determinant of foundation models' performance, but there is no standard guideline for allocating a limited computational budget across different data sources. Most current approaches either rely on extensive experiments with smaller models or dynamic data adjustments that also require proxy models, both of which significantly increase the workflow complexity and computational overhead. In this paper, we introduce Adaptive Data Optimization (ADO), an algorithm that optimizes data distributions in an online fashion, concurrent with model training. Unlike existing techniques, ADO does not require external knowledge, proxy models, or modifications to the model update. Instead, ADO uses per-domain scaling laws to estimate the learning potential of each domain during training and adjusts the data mixture accordingly, making it more scalable and easier to integrate. Experiments demonstrate that ADO can achieve comparable or better performance than prior methods while maintaining computational efficiency across different computation scales, offering a practical solution for dynamically adjusting data distribution without sacrificing flexibility or increasing costs. Beyond its practical benefits, ADO also provides a new perspective on data collection strategies via scaling laws.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Language Models Improve When Pretraining Data Matches Target Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ranking pretraining documents by similarity to benchmark training examples (BETR) yields consistent benchmark gains and a 2.1x compute multiplier over DCLM-Baseline.

  2. Ambient Diffusion Omni: Training Good Models with Bad Data

    cs.GR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ambient Diffusion Omni trains diffusion models on mixed-quality data by learning when corrupted images can be treated as clean, improving generation quality and diversity.

  3. Using Scaling Laws for Data Source Utility Estimation in Domain-Specific Pre-Training

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Running multiple short annealing runs at different token scales can reveal per-source utility scaling curves that change data-source rankings compared with single point estimates.

Pith tools