Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comment on "High-Power Collective Charging of a Solid-State Quantum Battery"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04132 v1 pith:3ISFKY3Z submitted 2024-10-23 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumadvantagebatterychargingdickeenhancementlettersphysical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In the Letter [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)], Ferraro \emph{et al.} claimed a quantum advantage in the Dicke quantum battery (QB), whereby $N$ two-level systems (TLS) are coupled to a common photonic mode of a cavity. They argued that compared with the so-called Rabi QB, the Dicke QB exhibits a $\sqrt{N}$ quantum enhancement in the charging power because of the entanglement created by the common photonic mode. In this Comment, however, we demonstrate that the apparent $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement actually comes from the stronger cavity electric (or magnetic) field under the setup discussed in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)]. This is a trivial classical effect, and there is no true "quantum advantage" in the charging power of the Dicke QB. While somewhat similar questions regarding the origin of the claimed "quantum advantage" have been raised before, here we would like to make it clear that the $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)] is purely a classical effect, not attributable to quantum entanglement or collective phenomena. Therefore, we believe that using the term "quantum battery" in this context may be inappropriate and misleading.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reply to the comment on "High-Power Collective Charging of a Solid-State Quantum Battery" by Haowei Xu and Ju Li

    quant-ph 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    The authors concede Xu and Li's criticisms of the Dicke quantum battery are valid, then argue the same points were already covered in earlier literature, so the comment adds no novelty.

Pith tools