Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Field Polynomial Inflation in Palatini $f(R,\phi)$ Gravity

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Large-field polynomial inflation in Palatini f(R, phi) gravity can match Planck and BICEP/Keck data over broad parameter regions, and a negative R-squared coupling can suppress the tensor-to-scalar ratio to CMB-S4 levels.

arxiv 2411.07995 v2 pith:GBK4J54E submitted 2024-11-12 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Nilay Bostan , Canan Karahan , Ozan Sarg{i}n This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords gravityinflationpolynomialinflatonbetalarge-fieldpalatiniparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These conclusions depend on assumptions that the authors state openly: instantaneous reheating, the truncation of the potential at quartic order even at trans-Planckian field values, and the equivalence of Jordan and Einstein frame perturbations in Palatini gravity. The paper does not release code or data files, and the numerical iteration algorithm is described only qualitatively.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is that "a substantial portion of the parameter space aligns with the observational data" for large-field polynomial inflation in Palatini f(R, phi) gravity (abstract and Sec. 5). Concretely, for all four coupling setups there exist (phi0, beta) regions whose slow-roll predictions for ns and r fall inside the Planck and BICEP/Keck 2018 contours, and a negative alpha R^2 term can push r down to about 5 x 10^-4, inside the CMB-S4 sensitivity forecast.

Load-bearing premise

The scan assumes instantaneous reheating, i.e. omega_reh = 1/3, so the number of e-folds is set by Eq. (4.7): N* approximately 64.7 + 0.5 ln rho* - 0.25 ln rho_e. This fixes N* to about 59 to 60 for all models. If reheating is not instantaneous, N* shifts by several e-folds and the predicted ns moves by roughly 10^-3 to 10^-2, which would move the compliant (phi0, beta, alpha, xi) regions relative to the BICEP/Keck contours. The paper flags this as an assumption, but the advertised parameter-space alignment depends on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculations are standard slow-roll applications. The model parameters beta, phi0, alpha, and xi are hand-scanned, and d is normalized to the Planck curvature amplitude, so the claim of viability is a consistency fit rather than a sharp prediction. No new entities are introduced. The main background assumptions are instant reheating, quartic truncation at trans-Planckian field values, and the Palatini frame equivalence of perturbations from [83].

free parameters (5)
  • beta = 6.6e-3 and 8e-3 in main scans; broader compliant range roughly 3.9e-3 to 9.3e-3
    Hand-chosen flatness parameter that controls the slope of the polynomial potential near the saddle point. The predicted ns and r depend directly on it.
  • phi0 = Roughly 7.94 to 20.95 in Planck units across tables
    Hand-scanned location of the saddle point, restricted to phi0 >= 1 for the large-field regime. It controls the field value at which inflation occurs and strongly affects r.
  • d = Roughly 2.4e-14 to 7.7e-14 in Planck units
    Overall normalization of the polynomial potential, fixed by matching the Planck curvature perturbation amplitude Delta_R^2 approximately 2.1e-9 through Eqs. (4.6) and (4.11).
  • alpha = Scanned over -10^5 to -10^10; tables use -10^8
    Coefficient of the R^2 Starobinsky term in the action. Chosen by hand to explore the suppression of the tensor-to-scalar ratio.
  • xi = Scanned over 10^-6, 10^-5, 10^-4, 3e-4, and negative values; tables use 10^-4
    Nonminimal coupling constant of the inflaton to curvature. Chosen by hand; it lowers both ns and r as it increases.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Slow-roll approximation: the inflaton satisfies the standard slow-roll equations (4.1) to (4.3) and (4.10) to (4.11) from horizon exit until epsilon = 1.
    Used throughout Sec. 4 to compute ns, r, alpha_s, N*, and Delta_R^2. If slow roll fails near the saddle point, the predictions change.
  • domain assumption Instant reheating with omega_reh = 1/3, fixing N* through Eq. (4.7).
    The paper explicitly assumes this in Sec. 4. The e-fold number in the tables, 59 to 60, and hence the predicted ns, depend on it.
  • domain assumption Jordan-frame and Einstein-frame perturbation spectra are equivalent in Palatini gravity, following Kubota et al. [83].
    Invoked in Sec. 3.2.2 to justify computing observables in the Einstein frame. If this equivalence fails, all the Einstein-frame predictions would need revision.
  • domain assumption The renormalizable quartic potential remains the full effective potential at trans-Planckian field values, with higher-order operators suppressed.
    Footnote 1 states this based on reference [82]. If higher-order terms are not negligible for phi0 >> M_Pl, the potential and all scan results change.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary field chi can be eliminated using the slow-roll solution chi^2 = 8 V / M_Pl^2 (Eqs. 3.15 and 3.26).
    Used to derive the Einstein-frame potentials (3.20) and (3.30). Neglects (nabla phi)^2 terms relative to V, standard in the slow-roll regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Field Polynomial Inflation in Palatini $f(R,\phi)$ Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GBK4J54E

@misc{pith2026241107995,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Field Polynomial Inflation in Palatini $f(R,\phi)$ Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GBK4J54E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.07995}
}
abstract

In this paper, we employ the Palatini formalism to investigate the dynamics of large-field inflation using a renormalizable polynomial inflaton potential in the context of $f(R,\phi)$ gravity. Assuming instant reheating, we make a comparative analysis of large-field polynomial inflation (PI). We first consider the minimal and non-minimal coupling of inflaton in $R$ gravity, and then we continue with the minimally and non-minimally coupled inflaton in $f(R,\phi)$ gravity. We scan the parameter space for the inflationary predictions ($n_s$ and $r$) consistent with the Planck and BICEP/Keck 2018 results as well as the sensitivity forecast of the future CMB-S4 and depict the compliant regions in the $\phi_0-\beta$ plane where $\phi_0$ and $\beta$ are two parameters of polynomial inflation model which control the saddle point of the potential and the flatness in the vicinity of this point respectively. We find that a substantial portion of the parameter space aligns with the observational data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism

    gr-qc 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A parameter scan of constant-roll β-exponential inflation in Palatini R² gravity claims agreement with ACT/Planck contours, but the derivation is undermined by algebraic sign errors and an absent non-Gaussianity calculation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 99

    1980

  2. [2]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

    1981

  3. [3]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389

    1982

  4. [4]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

    1982

  5. [5]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532

    1981

  6. [6]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110

    1982

  7. [7]

    S. W. Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, Phys. Lett. B, 115 (1982), 295

    1982

  8. [8]

    Ellis and D

    J. Ellis and D. Wands, Inflation, ‘Review of Particle Physics’: R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2022, 083C01 (2022) and 2023 update

    2022

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia Inflationaris , Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6, 75 (2014) [arXiv:1303.3787]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, I. Giannakoudi, F. P. Fronimos and E. C. Lymperiadou, Recent Advances in Inflation, Symmetry 15 (2023) no.9, 1701, [arXiv:2307.16308]. – 23 –

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle, The primordial density perturbation: Cosmology, inflation and the origin of structure , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Pr. (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck Collaboration], Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020) [arXiv:1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. [BICEP, Keck], Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season , Phys. Rev. Lett. 151301, 127, 15 (2021) [arXiv:2110.00483]

    2021

  6. [14]

    Kobayashi and O

    T. Kobayashi and O. Seto, Polynomial inflation models after BICEP2 , Phys. Rev. D, 89, 103524 (2014), [arXiv:1403.5055]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Drees and Y

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, Parameter space of leptogenesis in polynomial inflation , JCAP 04, 036 (2024), [arXiv:2401.02485]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Destri, H

    C. Destri, H. J. de Vega and N. G. Sanchez, Monte Carlo Markov chains analysis of WMAP3 and SDSS data points to broken symmetry inflaton potentials and provides a lower bound on the tensor to scalar ratio , Phys. Rev. D, 77, 043509 (2008), [arXiv:0703417]

    2008

  9. [17]

    Wolfson and R

    I. Wolfson and R. Brustein, Likelihood analysis of small field polynomial models of inflation yielding a high Tensor-to-Scalar ratio , PLoS ONE 14(4): e0215287, [arXiv:1801.07057]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bernal and Y

    N. Bernal and Y. Xu, Polynomial inflation and dark matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 877, [arXiv:2106.03950]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Enqvist, A

    K. Enqvist, A. Mazumdar and P. Stephens, Inflection point inflation within supersymmetry , JCAP 06, 020 (2010) [arXiv:1004.3724]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hotchkiss, A

    S. Hotchkiss, A. Mazumdar and S. Nadathur, Inflection point inflation: WMAP constraints and a solution to the fine-tuning problem , JCAP 06, 002 (2011) [arXiv:1101.6046]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dimopoulos, C

    K. Dimopoulos, C. Owen and A. Racioppi, Loop inflection-point inflation, Astropart. Phys. 103 16 (2018) [arXiv: 1706.09735]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Okada and D

    N. Okada and D. Raut, Inflection-point Higgs Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 95 035035 (2017) [arXiv: 1610.09362]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Okada, S

    N. Okada, S. Okada and D. Raut, Inflection-point inflation in hyper-charge oriented U(1) X model, Phys. Rev. D 95 055030 (2017) [arXiv:1702.02938]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Okada, D

    N. Okada, D. Raut and Q. Shafi, Inflection-Point Inflation with Axion Dark Matter in light of Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 812 136001 (2021) [arXiv:1910.14586]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bai and D

    Y. Bai and D. Stolarski, Dynamical Inflection Point Inflation , JCAP 03 091 (2021) [arXiv: 2008.09639]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    H. M. Hodges, G.R. Blumenthal, L.A. Kofman and J.R. Primack, Nonstandard Primordial Fluctuations From a Polynomial Inflaton Potential , Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 197

    1990

  19. [27]

    Destri, H.J

    C. Destri, H.J. de Vega and N.G. Sanchez, MCMC analysis of WMAP3 and SDSS data points to broken symmetry inflaton potentials and provides a lower bound on the tensor to scalar ratio , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043509 [ astro-ph/0703417]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aslanyan, L.C

    G. Aslanyan, L.C. Price, J. Adams, T. Bringmann, H.A. Clark, R. Easther et al., Ultracompact minihalos as probes of inflationary cosmology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 141102 [arXiv:1512.04597]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Allahverdi, K

    R. Allahverdi, K. Enqvist, J. Garcia-Bellido and A. Mazumdar, Gauge invariant MSSM inflaton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 191304 [ hep-ph/0605035]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Nakayama, F

    K. Nakayama, F. Takahashi and T.T. Yanagida, Polynomial Chaotic Inflation in the Planck Era, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 111 [ arXiv:1303.7315]. – 24 –

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Nakayama, F

    K. Nakayama, F. Takahashi and T.T. Yanagida, Polynomial Chaotic Inflation in Supergravity , JCAP 08 (2013) 038 [ arXiv:1305.5099]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and A. Westphal, Chaotic Inflation in Supergravity after Planck and BICEP2, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023534, [arXiv:1405.0270]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    T. Li, Z. Sun, C. Tian and L. Wu, The Renormalizable Three-Term Polynomial Inflation with Large Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 301, [arXiv:1407.8063]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gao and Z.-K

    T.-J. Gao and Z.-K. Guo, Inflection point inflation and dark energy in supergravity , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 123502, [arXiv:1503.05643]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Musoke and R

    N. Musoke and R. Easther, Expectations for Inflationary Observables: Simple or Natural? , JCAP 12 (2017) 032, [arXiv:1709.01192]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A. D. Linde and A. Westphal, Accidental Inflation in String Theory , JCAP 03 (2008) 005, [ arXiv:0712.1610]

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. D. Linde, On the Problem of Initial Conditions for Inflation , Found. Phys. 48, 1246–1260 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Brandenberger, Initial conditions for inflation — A short review , Int

    R. Brandenberger, Initial conditions for inflation — A short review , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 26, 1740002 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Garfinkle, A

    D. Garfinkle, A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, Initial conditions problem in cosmological inflation revisited, Phys. Lett. B, 843, 138028, (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Drees and Y

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, Small field polynomial inflation: reheating, radiative stability and lower bound, JCAP 09 (2021) 012, [ arXiv:2104.03977]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Drees and Y

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, Large field polynomial inflation: parameter space, predictions and (double) eternal nature , JCAP 12, 005 (2022), [arXiv:2209.07545]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    F. Y. Zhang and W. Lin, Inflation and reheating predictions in polynomial inflation with small and large fields , Phys. Lett. B 855, 138765 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    H. A. Buchdahl, Non-linear Lagrangians and cosmological theory, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Socy., 150, 1 (1970)

    1970

  36. [44]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f(R) Theories, Living Rev. Relativ., 13, 3 (2010), [arXiv:1002.4928]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451–497, [arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity , Phys. Rept. 509 (2011) 167–321, [arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology , Phys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1–189, [arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution , Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1–104, [arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models, Phys. Rept., 505 (2011), 59-144, [arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bostan, C

    N. Bostan, C. Karahan and O. Sargın, Inflation in symmergent metric-Palatini gravity , JCAP,02, 028 (2024), [arXiv:2308.04507]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Myrzakulov, L

    R. Myrzakulov, L. Sebastiani, S. Vagnozzi, Inflation in f (R, ϕ)-theories and mimetic gravity scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C, 75, 444 (2015) , [arXiv:1504.07984]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [52]

    T. Mori, K. Kohri and J. White, Multi-field effects in a simple extension of R2 inflation, JCAP, 10, 044 (2017), [arXiv:1705.05638]. – 25 –

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Palatini’s method

    M. Ferraris, M. Francaviglia and C. Reina, Variational formulation of general relativity from 1915 to 1925 “Palatini’s method” discovered by Einstein in 1925 , Gen. Rel. Grav., 14, 243 (1982)

    1982

  46. [54]

    Papapetrou and J

    A. Papapetrou and J. Stachel, A new Lagrangian for the vacuum Einstein equations and its tetrad form, Gen. Rel. Grav., 9, 1075 (1978)

    1978

  47. [55]

    Kunstatter, Palatini variation of a generalized Einstein Lagrangian , Gen

    G. Kunstatter, Palatini variation of a generalized Einstein Lagrangian , Gen. Rel. Grav., 12, 373 (1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    Ferraris, M

    M. Ferraris, M. Francaviglia and I. Volovich, The Universality of vacuum Einstein equations with cosmological constant, Class.Quant.Grav., 11, 1505 (1994)

    1994

  49. [57]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S. Liberati, Metric-affine f (R) theories of gravity , Annals Phys., 322, 935 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Antoniadis, A

    I. Antoniadis, A. Karam, A. Lykkas and K. Tamvakis, Palatini inflation in models with an R2 term, JCAP, 11, 028 (2018), [arXiv:1810.10418]

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bostan and R

    N. Bostan and R. H. Dejrah, Minimally coupled β-exponential inflation with an R2 term in the Palatini formulation , [arXiv:2409.10398]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Dioguardi, A

    C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi and E. Tomberg, Beyond (and back to) Palatini quadratic gravity and inflation , JCAP, 03, 041 (2024), [arXiv:2212.11869]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T. D. Pappas and E. Tomberg, Implications of Palatini gravity for inflation and beyond , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 20, no.13, 2330007 (2023), [arXiv:2303.14148]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dioguardi, A

    C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi and E. Tomberg, Slow-roll inflation in Palatini F(R) gravity , JHEP, 06, 106 (2022), [arXiv:2112.12149]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    AlHallak, N

    M. AlHallak, N. Chamoun and M. S. Eldaher, Natural Inflation with non minimal coupling to gravity in R 2 gravity under the Palatini formalism , JCAP, 10, 001 (2022), [arXiv:2202.01002]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    A. B. Lahanas, Issues in Palatini R2 inflation: Bounds on the reheating temperature , Phys. Rev. D , 106, no.12, 123530 (2022), [arXiv:2210.00837]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam and A. Racioppi, Dynamically induced Planck scale and inflation in the Palatini formulation , JCAP, 11, 014 (2020), [arXiv:2006.09124]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    I. D. Gialamas and A. B. Lahanas, Reheating in R2 Palatini inflationary models , Phys. Rev. D, 101, 084007 (2020), [arXiv:1911.11513]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Lykkas and T. D. Pappas, Palatini-Higgs inflation with non-minimal derivative coupling , Phys. Rev. D, 102, no.6, 063522 (2020), [arXiv:2008.06371]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T. D. Pappas and V. C. Spanos, Scale-invariant quadratic gravity and inflation in the Palatini formalism , Phys. Rev. D, 104, 023521 (2021), [arXiv:2104.04550]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Allemandi, A

    G. Allemandi, A. Borowiec, M. Francaviglia and S. D. Odintsov, Dark energy dominance and cosmic acceleration in first order formalism , Phys. Rev. D, 72, 063505 (2005), [arXiv:gr-qc/0504057]

    2005 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Bauer and D

    F. Bauer and D. A. Demir, Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric versus Palatini Formulations, Phys. Lett. B, 665, 222-226 (2008), [arXiv:0803.2664]

    2008 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Bostan, Palatini double-well and Coleman-Weinberg potentials with non-minimal coupling , JCAP, 04, 042 (2021)

    N. Bostan, Palatini double-well and Coleman-Weinberg potentials with non-minimal coupling , JCAP, 04, 042 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Bostan, Non-minimally coupled quartic inflation with Coleman-Weinberg one-loop corrections in the Palatini formulation , Phys

    N. Bostan, Non-minimally coupled quartic inflation with Coleman-Weinberg one-loop corrections in the Palatini formulation , Phys. Lett. B, 811 (2020), 135954, [arXiv:1907.13235]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Tenkanen, Resurrecting Quadratic Inflation with a non-minimal coupling to gravity , JCAP, 12, 001 (2017), [arXiv:1710.02758]

    T. Tenkanen, Resurrecting Quadratic Inflation with a non-minimal coupling to gravity , JCAP, 12, 001 (2017), [arXiv:1710.02758]. – 26 –

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Rasanen and P

    S. Rasanen and P. Wahlman, Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formulation , JCAP 11, 047 (2017), [arXiv:1709.07853]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Rubio and E

    J. Rubio and E. S. Tomberg, Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation , JCAP, 04, 021 (2019), [arXiv:1902.10148]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Tenkanen, Minimal Higgs inflation with an R2 term in Palatini gravity , Phys

    T. Tenkanen, Minimal Higgs inflation with an R2 term in Palatini gravity , Phys. Rev. D, 99, no.6, 063528 (2019), [arXiv:1901.01794]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Dimopoulos, A

    K. Dimopoulos, A. Karam, S. S´ anchez L´ opez and E. Tomberg,Palatini R 2 quintessential inflation, JCAP, 10, 076 (2022), [arXiv:2206.14117]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Antoniadis, A

    I. Antoniadis, A. Karam, A. Lykkas, T. Pappas and K. Tamvakis, Rescuing Quartic and Natural Inflation in the Palatini Formalism , JCAP, 03, 005 (2019), [arXiv:1812.00847]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Karam, E

    A. Karam, E. Tomberg and H. Veerm¨ ae,Tachyonic preheating in Palatini R 2 inflation , JCAP, 06, 023 (2021), [arXiv:2102.02712]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Karam, T

    A. Karam, T. Pappas and K. Tamvakis, Nonminimal Coleman–Weinberg Inflation with an R2 term, JCAP, 02, 006 (2019), [arXiv:1810.12884]

    2019 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bernal, J

    N. Bernal, J. Harz, M. A. Mojahed and Y. Xu, Graviton- and Inflaton-mediated Dark Matter Production after Large Field Polynomial Inflation , [arXiv:2406.19447]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Jinno, M

    R. Jinno, M. Kubota, K.-y. Oda and S. C. Park, Higgs inflation in metric and Palatini formalisms: required suppression of higher dimensional operators , JCAP, 03, 063 (2020), [arXiv:1904.05699]

    2020 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kubota, K.-y

    M. Kubota, K.-y. Oda, K. Shimada and M. Yamaguchi, Cosmological perturbations in Palatini formalism, JCAP, 03, 006 (2021), [arXiv:2010.07867]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kohri, Y

    K. Kohri, Y. Oyama, T. Sekiguchi and T. Takahashi, Precise Measurements of Primordial Power Spectrum with 21 cm Fluctuations , JCAP 1310, 065 (2013), [arXiv:1303.1688]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Basse, J

    T. Basse, J. Hamann, S. Hannestad and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Getting leverage on inflation with a large photometric redshift survey , JCAP, 1506, no. 06, 042 (2015), [arXiv:1409.3469]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, M. Kamionkowski and J. Silk, Towards a measurement of the spectral runnings , JCAP, 1705, 032 (2017), [arXiv:1611.05883]

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Abazajian, G

    K. Abazajian, G. Addison, P. Adshead, Z. Ahmed, S. W. Allen, D. Alonso, M. Alvarez, A. Anderson, K. S. Arnold and C. Baccigalupi, et al. CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , [arXiv:1907.04473]

    1907 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?, Phys. Rev. D, 68, 103503 (2003), [arXiv:0305263]

    2003

  81. [89]

    Linde, M

    A. Linde, M. Noorbala and A. Westphal, Observational consequences of chaotic inflation with nonminimal coupling to gravity , JCAP, 1103, 013 (2011), [arXiv:1101.2652]

    2011 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Enckell, K

    V.-M. Enckell, K. Enqvist, S. Rasanen and L.-P. Wahlman, Inflation with R2 term in the Palatini formulation , JCAP 1902 (2019) 022, [arXiv:1810.05536]. – 27 –

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.