Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Assessing the growth of structure over cosmic time with CMB lensing

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that CMB lensing measurements at intermediate redshifts agree with the Planck ΛCDM prediction, localizing the S8 tension to lower redshifts or higher wavenumbers.

desk verdict Useful, honest review of where CMB lensing leaves the S8 tension; the central localization claim is weaker than it looks because the lensing-only S8 constraints lean on an early-universe n_s prior. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08152 v1 pith:GY5MQQYP submitted 2024-11-12 astro-ph.CO

Mathew S. Madhavacheril This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords CMBlensingS8tensionstructuregrowthΛCDMcosmicshearlarge-scaleauto-spectrumcosmologicalparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review of CMB gravitational lensing as a probe of how structure grows, written around a specific claim: direct measurements of the matter distribution at redshifts z ≈ 1–3 and large scales k < 0.1 Mpc⁻¹, from the CMB lensing auto-spectra of Planck, ACT, and SPT, are in excellent agreement with the growth predicted by Planck's primary CMB under the ΛCDM model. This matters because many late-universe probes report an amplitude of structure S8 that is 2–3σ lower than that same prediction, and it has been unclear whether the mismatch is a systematic, a modeling failure, or new physics. The review argues that, if the S8 tension is not a statistical fluctuation, the agreement of CMB lensing at intermediate redshifts and large scales pushes its origin to low redshifts or high wavenumbers, where the CMB lensing auto-spectrum is not sensitive. It also surveys tomographic cross-correlations with galaxy samples and outlines how future data will map the matter power spectrum over cosmic time.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the CMB lensing convergence field κ(ˆn) and its angular auto-spectrum. The convergence is a line-of-sight integral of the matter overdensity weighted by the lensing kernel WκCMB(z), which peaks near z ∼ 1–3, so the auto-spectrum CκκL under the Limber approximation is a direct integral of the non-linear matter power spectrum P_NL_mm(k = L/χ(z), z) over cosmic time. Because the kernel is broad, the auto-spectrum shape carries some tomographic information, with low multipoles weighted toward z < 0.5 and high multipoles toward higher redshift; and because it is evaluated at k < 0.1 Mpc⁻¹ for current measurements, linear theory is an excellent approximation and baryonic feedback does not affect the inference.

What would settle it

Measure the CMB lensing auto-spectrum at multipoles corresponding to k < 0.1 Mpc⁻¹ with total uncertainty several times smaller than current measurements; a robust offset from the Planck ΛCDM prediction at these scales would refute the claim that intermediate-redshift linear growth is standard.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a localization: the linear-regime growth of structure at intermediate redshifts is not where the S8 tension lives. The CMB lensing convergence field κ(ˆn) integrates the matter overdensity along lines of sight back to recombination, with most weight at z ∼ 1–3, and its auto-spectrum CκκL probes wavenumbers k < 0.1 Mpc⁻¹, where linear theory is accurate and baryonic feedback is negligible. The most recent Planck, ACT, and SPT lensing auto-spectrum measurements all agree with the amplitude predicted by Planck primary CMB anisotropies under flat ΛCDM, and the paper states that if the S8 tension is not statistical, its origin must be traced to lower redshifts or higher wavenumbers than this probe is significantly sensitive to. Cross-correlations of CMB lensing with spectroscopically calibrated galaxy samples extend the comparison over cosmic time, with the DESI LRG tomography giving a first hint that the lowest redshift bin deviates most from Planck.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the messy astrophysics of ordinary matter does not change the lensing signal enough to matter on the scales and redshifts being tested; if it did, the agreement with Planck would not cleanly rule out new physics there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, no new physics is needed to explain structure growth at z ≈ 1–3 on linear scales; the standard ΛCDM growth prediction passes a direct test at those epochs.
  • The S8 tension, if real, must originate at z ≲ 1 or at k ≳ 0.1 Mpc⁻¹, which are the regimes where the CMB lensing auto-spectrum has little leverage.
  • Cosmic shear analyses that include small scales (k > 0.2 Mpc⁻¹) are the ones reporting low S8, while '2x2' analyses that avoid those scales with conservative modeling agree with Planck, pointing to non-linear modeling or baryonic feedback as a likely culprit.
  • Tomographic cross-correlations can map S8(z): the DESI LRG × CMB lensing analysis finds its lowest-redshift bin (z ≈ 0.47) shows the largest deviation from Planck, motivating lower-redshift probes.
  • Future higher-precision CMB lensing data should resolve the auto-spectrum's low-L and high-L parts separately, yielding tomographic growth information and distinguishing a late-time growth suppression from unresolved astrophysics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cleanest next test is a low-redshift, large-scale growth measurement that does not rely on cosmic shear shape noise, such as redshift-space distortions or peculiar velocities at z < 0.5; a persistent low S8 there would support new physics, while agreement would implicate shear modeling.
  • If the tension is driven by baryonic feedback on k > 0.1 Mpc⁻¹, then the 2x2 successes imply that future cosmic shear analyses can stay consistent with Planck by cutting to large scales at the cost of precision, making this a falsifiable prediction for ongoing galaxy-lensing surveys.
  • The localization argument also predicts that Lyman-α forest results, which probe k ∼ 1 Mpc⁻¹ at z = 2–5, should show a low amplitude when interpreted with the same ΛCDM priors; the paper notes eBOSS forest fits already do, which is a consistency check of the high-k branch.
  • A stronger auto-spectrum-only tomography from next-generation data could independently separate z < 0.5 from z > 1 contributions; if the low-redshift component comes out low while the high-redshift component stays at Planck, the S8 tension would be firmly a low-redshift phenomenon.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review article, written for a Royal Society meeting volume, assessing how measurements of CMB lensing constrain the growth of cosmic structure and the S8 tension. It reviews the linear theory of structure growth (Section 2), the lensing formalism and its observational challenges (Section 3), and compiles current S8 constraints from CMB lensing and other probes (Section 4, Fig. 4). Its central thesis, stated in Section 4, is that CMB lensing auto-spectra from Planck, ACT, and SPT at intermediate redshifts (z~1-3) and large scales (k<0.1 Mpc^-1) agree with the Planck ΛCDM prediction, implying that if the S8 tension is not a statistical fluctuation, its origin must lie at lower redshifts or higher wave-numbers than the lensing auto-spectrum can probe.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the review sharpens the interpretation of the S8 tension by pointing to low-redshift or small-scale physics rather than a breakdown of linear growth at intermediate redshifts. The paper is a clear, well-structured status report with transparent treatment of measurement systematics, a useful compilation of current constraints (Fig. 4), and an instructive pedagogical discussion of growth and lensing kernels. It also contains an original information-matrix calculation (Fig. 3) that usefully exposes how lensing-only S8 constraints depend on priors; this is valuable even though it complicates the paper's central claim. The review's significance lies in its synthesis rather than new measurements, and its main conclusions are plausible but need to be qualified as described in the major comments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4 / Fig. 4 / Sec. 3(b), Fig. 3] The central claim that CMB lensing auto-spectra are in 'excellent agreement' with the Planck prediction relies on S8 constraints from analyses that adopt an informative prior on the spectral index n_s and a BBN prior on Ω_b h^2, as described in Section 3(b). Figure 3 itself shows that broadening the n_s prior degrades the S8 uncertainty by up to 50%, meaning that the lensing data alone carries substantially less constraining power than the plotted points suggest. The agreement with the Planck CMB extrapolation is therefore not a fully independent confirmation of growth at intermediate redshifts; it partly reflects early-universe information shared between the data and the prediction. The paper should either quantify how the central value and uncertainty of S8 change when a much broader or uninformative n_s prior is used, or explicitly frame the conclusion as conditional on adopting the Planck-motivated prior. Without such a test, the inference that the S8 tension must reside at lower redshifts or higher k is weaker than stated.
  2. [Sec. 1 and Sec. 4, with Eq. (3.5)] The claim that the CMB lensing auto-spectrum probes 'primarily wave-numbers k <0.1 Mpc^-1 at z = 1-5' is difficult to reconcile with the multipole ranges of current measurements and Eq. (3.5), where k = L/χ(z). For z ~ 1-3, χ(z) is roughly 1400-4500 Mpc, so even L = 500 corresponds to k ≈ 0.1-0.35 Mpc^-1, and the ACT DR6 analysis (ref. [83]) uses multipoles extending to a few thousand. The paper should either provide a weighted estimate of the range of k that contributes to the S8 constraints from the auto-spectrum or correct the 'k <0.1 Mpc^-1' statement. This matters because the argument that the tension must be at 'higher wave-numbers' depends on knowing which scales the auto-spectrum actually constrains.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 and Eq. (2.2)] The figure legend states that the solid lines are the analytic form in Eq. (2.2) and the dashed lines are numerical CLASS results, but the text immediately before the figure says the analytic form becomes inaccurate at high redshift because radiation is neglected; please make explicit in the caption that the solid curves neglect radiation and are intended for z < 200.
  2. [Sec. 3(a)] The sentence 'The resulting reconstruction κ̂(L) (the inverse harmonic transform of the map)' is slightly confusing because κ̂(L) is a harmonic-space quantity while the inverse harmonic transform is the map itself; please rephrase for clarity.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption describes the information-matrix calculation as 'loosely based on the experimental configuration' of ref. [108], but does not specify the fiducial cosmology, multipole range, noise level, or whether BAO information is included; adding these details would make the figure more reproducible and its interpretation clearer.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption notes that priors may differ between analyses; given the major comment about n_s priors, it would be helpful to add a note in the caption or text indicating that the CMB lensing points all adopt an informative n_s prior, so that readers can properly interpret the comparison with the Planck prediction.
  5. [References] The reference list contains duplicate entries (e.g., refs. [51] and [86] are the same paper by Omori et al. 2017); these should be consolidated or cross-referenced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's central synthesis rests on published public-data analyses; the disclosed ns-prior dependence is a caveat, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

This paper is a review article, not a derivation, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The central claim in Section 4 — that CMB lensing auto-spectra from Planck, ACT, and SPT agree with the Planck CMB prediction at z~1-3 and k<0.1 Mpc^-1, localizing the S8 tension to lower redshifts or higher wavenumbers — is an interpretation of externally published analyses with public maps and null-test suites, not of results derived inside this paper. Self-citations to ACT DR6 (e.g., refs [82,83,108]) are standard references to those public analyses and are not load-bearing assertions unique to this review. The one substantive caveat is disclosed by the paper itself: the ACT DR6 'lensing alone' S8 constraint uses an informative prior on ns that is 'a reasonable distillation of CMB anisotropy information on the initial conditions' (Sec 3(b), Fig. 3), and Fig. 3 shows that broadening that prior can degrade the S8 constraint by up to 50%. This means the lensing-based constraint is not fully independent of the early-universe model being compared to, so the advertised agreement should be read with that caveat. However, the prior is on ns, not on S8, and the paper explicitly quantifies its effect rather than hiding it, so the agreement is not forced by construction. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming of a known result is present. The finding is therefore 'no significant circularity,' with a minor score of 2 for the mild self-citation and prior-dependence caveat.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. It relies on standard cosmological perturbation theory and on the published assumption that CMB lensing at the scales used is insensitive to baryonic feedback. The main load-bearing input from the prior literature is the baryonic feedback negligibility cited to [116].

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Linear perturbation theory with the growth factor D(a) factorizes the matter power spectrum (Eq. 2.1, 2.2).
    Used throughout Section 2 to define sigma8 and predict growth; standard result from LambdaCDM.
  • standard math Limber approximation for angular power spectra (Eq. 3.5) adequately maps C_L to P(k,z).
    Used to compute CMB lensing auto-spectrum and cross-correlations; valid on the scales considered.
  • domain assumption Baryonic feedback and non-linear corrections are negligible for CMB lensing at k<0.1 Mpc^-1 (cited to [116]).
    Load-bearing for the conclusion that CMB lensing cleanly tests linear growth; if false, the localization of the S8 tension to low-z/high-k would be weakened.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Assessing the growth of structure over cosmic time with CMB lensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GY5MQQYP

@misc{pith2026241108152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Assessing the growth of structure over cosmic time with CMB lensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GY5MQQYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08152}
}
abstract

The standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model informed by cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies makes a precise prediction for the growth of matter density fluctuations over cosmic time on linear scales. A variety of cosmological observables offer independent and complementary ways of testing this prediction, but results have been mixed, with many constraints on the amplitude of structure $S_8$ being 2-3$\sigma$ lower than the expectation from Planck primary CMB anisotropies. It is currently unclear whether these discrepancies are due to observational systematics, non-linearities and baryonic effects or new physics. We review how gravitational lensing of the CMB has and will continue to provide insights into this problem, including through tomographic cross-correlations with galaxy surveys over cosmic time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08152 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Linear growth factors D(z) in an EdS and ΛCDM universe are shown in red and blue, respectively. The solid lines are the analytic form in Eq. 2.2 and the dashed lines are an exact numerical calculation from CLASS; the former ignores radiation. The dotted lines show lensing kernels W(z) for a galaxy lensing source at z = 1 (light gray) and for CMB lensing (light purple). The vertical dashed line marked zΛ marks the re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The CMB lensing auto-spectrum is shown here for cumulatively higher redshift cutoffs, from blue (z < 0.5) to red (z < 20) with the latter containing nearly all of the full CMB lensing power (dashed black line). Lower multipoles contain more information from lower redshifts with the angular power spectrum peak Lp = keqχ(zeff ) shifting to higher multipoles as higher redshifts are included. (a) Measuring CMB lensing C… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. CMB lensing analyses typically use a prior on the spectral index and physical baryon density for ‘lensing alone’ constraints. This information matrix calculation (loosely based on the experimental configuration in [108]) shows the relative uncertainty on S8 as a function of the prior width on ns (red) and Ωbh 2 (blue). The latter is not an informative prior; the BBN prior [109] used in [108] is shown as vertical blu… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A compilation of S8 constraints from various growth probes compared with primary CMB constraints (green). The priors and parameterizations in these various analyses may not be identical and there may be some covariance between the various growth probes. 4. Outlook and …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Low-redshift constraints on structure growth from CMB lensing tomography

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Low-redshift galaxy clustering and CMB lensing tomography with hybrid effective field theory gives S8=0.79±0.06, consistent with Planck, while data alone prefer Ωm=0.245±0.024.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [83]

    Qu FJ, Sherwin BD, Madhavacheril MS, Han D, Crowley KT, Abril-Cabezas I, Ade PAR, Aiola S, Alford T, Amiri M, Amodeo S, An R, Atkins Z, Austermann JE, Battaglia N, Battistelli ES, Beall JA, Bean R, Beringue B, Bhandarkar T, Biermann E, Bolliet B, Bond JR, Cai H, Calabrese E, Calafut V , Capalbo V , Carrero F, Carron J, Challinor A, Chesmore GE, Cho Hm, Ch...

    2024

  2. [1]

    1994 Cosmic Temperature Fluctuations from Two Years of COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers Observations

    Bennett CL, Kogut A, Hinshaw G, Banday AJ, Wright EL, Gorski KM, Wilkinson DT, Weiss R, Smoot GF, Meyer SS, Mather JC, Lubin P , Loewenstein K, Lineweaver C, Keegstra P , Kaita E, Jackson PD, Cheng ES. 1994 Cosmic Temperature Fluctuations from Two Years of COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers Observations. ApJ 436, 423. (10.1086/174918)

    work page doi:10.1086/174918 1994

  3. [2]

    2003 First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters

    Spergel DN, Verde L, Peiris HV , Komatsu E, Nolta MR, Bennett CL, Halpern M, Hinshaw G, Jarosik N, Kogut A, Limon M, Meyer SS, Page L, Tucker GS, Weiland JL, Wollack E, Wright EL. 2003 First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters. ApJS 148, 175–194. (10.1086/377226)

    doi:10.1086/377226 2003

  4. [3]

    2013 Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    Hinshaw G, Larson D, Komatsu E, Spergel DN, Bennett CL, Dunkley J, Nolta MR, Halpern M, Hill RS, Odegard N, Page L, Smith KM, Weiland JL, Gold B, Jarosik N, Kogut A, Limon M, Meyer SS, Tucker GS, Wollack E, Wright EL. 2013 Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results. ApJS 208, 19. (10.1088/0067- 0049/...

    doi:10.1088/0067- 2013

  5. [4]

    1999 A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes

    Torbet E, Devlin MJ, Dorwart WB, Herbig T, Miller AD, Nolta MR, Page L, Puchalla J, Tran HT. 1999 A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes. ApJ 521, L79–L82. (10.1086/312197)

    work page doi:10.1086/312197 1999

  6. [5]

    Melchiorri A, Ade PAR, de Bernardis P , Bock JJ, Borrill J, Boscaleri A, Crill BP , De Troia G, Farese P , Ferreira PG, Ganga K, de Gasperis G, Giacometti M, Hristov VV , Jaffe AH, Lange AE, Masi S, Mauskopf PD, Miglio L, Netterfield CB, Pascale E, Piacentini F, Romeo G, Ruhl 16royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000. . . . ...

  7. [6]

    2000 MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10’-5°

    Hanany S, Ade P , Balbi A, Bock J, Borrill J, Boscaleri A, de Bernardis P , Ferreira PG, Hristov VV , Jaffe AH, Lange AE, Lee AT, Mauskopf PD, Netterfield CB, Oh S, Pascale E, Rabii B, Richards PL, Smoot GF, Stompor R, Winant CD, Wu JHP . 2000 MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10’-5°. ApJ545, L5–L9....

    doi:10.1086/317322

  8. [7]

    2014 Planck 2013 results

    Planck Collaboration, Ade PAR, Aghanim N, Armitage-Caplan C, Arnaud M, Ashdown M, Atrio-Barand ela F, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Banday AJ, et al.. 2014 Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. A&A 571, A16. (10.1051/0004-6361/201321591)

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 2014

Show all 145 references
  1. [9]

    2020a Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Ballardini M, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartolo N, Basak S, Battye R, Benabed K, Bernard JP , Bersanelli M, Bielewicz P , Bock JJ, Bond JR, Borrill J, Bouchet FR, Boulanger F, Bucher M, Burigana C, Bu...

    2018

  2. [10]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Arroja F, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Ballardini M, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartolo N, Basak S, Battye R, Benabed K, Bernard JP , Bersanelli M, Bielewicz P , Bock JJ, Bond JR, Borrill J, Bouchet FR, Boulanger F, Bucher M, Buri...

    2018

  3. [12]

    2024 Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4)

    Tristram M, Banday AJ, Douspis M, Garrido X, Górski KM, Henrot-Versillé S, Hergt LT, Ili´ c S, Keskitalo R, Lagache G, Lawrence CR, Partridge B, Scott D. 2024 Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4). A&A 682, A37. (10.1051/0004- 6361/202348015)

    2024 doi

  4. [13]

    2023 Measurement of the CMB temperature power spectrum and constraints on cosmology from the SPT-3G 2018 T T , T E , and E E dataset

    Balkenhol L, Dutcher D, Spurio Mancini A, Doussot A, Benabed K, Galli S, Ade PAR, Anderson AJ, Ansarinejad B, Archipley M, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bianchini F, Bleem LE, Bouchet FR, Bryant L, Camphuis E, Carlstrom JE, Cecil TW, Chang CL, Chaubal P , Chichura PM, Chou TL, Coerver...

    2023

  5. [14]

    2020 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters

    Aiola S, Calabrese E, Maurin L, Naess S, Schmitt BL, Abitbol MH, Addison GE, Ade PAR, Alonso D, Amiri M, Amodeo S, Angile E, Austermann JE, Baildon T, Battaglia N, Beall JA, Bean R, Becker DT, Bond JR, Bruno SM, Calafut V , Campusano LE, Carrero F, Chesmore GE, Cho Hm, Choi SK...

    2020

  6. [15]

    Choi SK, Hasselfield M, Ho SPP , Koopman B, Lungu M, Abitbol MH, Addison GE, Ade PAR, Aiola S, Alonso D, Amiri M, Amodeo S, Angile E, Austermann JE, Baildon T, Battaglia N, Beall JA, Bean R, Becker DT, Bond JR, Bruno SM, Calabrese E, Calafut V , Campusano LE, Carrero F, Chesmo...

    2020

  7. [16]

    2022 Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on prerecombination early dark energy

    Hill JC, Calabrese E, Aiola S, Battaglia N, Bolliet B, Choi SK, Devlin MJ, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Ferraro S, Gallardo PA, Gluscevic V , Hasselfield M, Hilton M, Hincks AD, Hložek R, Koopman BJ, Kosowsky A, La Posta A, Louis T, Madhavacheril MS, McMahon J, Moodley K, Naes...

    2022

  8. [19]

    2021 Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory

    Alam S, Aubert M, Avila S, Balland C, Bautista JE, Bershady MA, Bizyaev D, Blanton MR, Bolton AS, Bovy J, Brinkmann J, Brownstein JR, Burtin E, Chabanier S, Chapman MJ, Choi PD, Chuang CH, Comparat J, Cousinou MC, Cuceu A, Dawson KS, de la Torre S, de Mattia A, Agathe VdS, des...

    2021

  9. [21]

    2024 The 3D Lyman- α forest power spectrum from eBOSS DR16

    de Belsunce R, Philcox OHE, Iršiˇ c V , McDonald P , Guy J, Palanque-Delabrouille N. 2024 The 3D Lyman- α forest power spectrum from eBOSS DR16. MNRAS 533, 3756–3770. (10.1093/mnras/stae2035)

    2024 doi

  10. [22]

    Bocquet S, Grandis S, Bleem LE, Klein M, Mohr JJ, Schrabback T, Abbott TMC, Ade PAR, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Allen SW, Alves O, Amon A, Anderson AJ, Annis J, Ansarinejad B, Austermann JE, Avila S, Bacon D, Bayliss M, Beall JA, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Bender AN, Benson BA, ...

    2024

  11. [23]

    2024 The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: Cosmology constraints from cluster abundances in the western Galactic hemisphere

    Ghirardini V , Bulbul E, Artis E, Clerc N, Garrel C, Grandis S, Kluge M, Liu A, Bahar YE, Balzer F, Chiu I, Comparat J, Gruen D, Kleinebreil F, Krippendorf S, Merloni A, Nandra K, Okabe N, Pacaud F, Predehl P , Ramos-Ceja ME, Reiprich TH, Sanders JS, Schrabback T, Seppi R, Zel...

    2024

  12. [24]

    2022 Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

    Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Annis J, Avila S, Bacon D, Baxter E, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Bernstein GM, Bhargava S, Birrer S, Blazek J, Brandao-Souza A, Bridle SL, Brooks D, Buckley-Geer E, Burke DL, Camacho H, Campos A, Carnero ...

    2022

  13. [25]

    2022 The three-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey

    Li X, Miyatake H, Luo W, More S, Oguri M, Hamana T, Mandelbaum R, Shirasaki M, Takada M, Armstrong R, Kannawadi A, Takita S, Miyazaki S, Nishizawa AJ, Plazas Malagon AA, Strauss MA, Tanaka M, Yoshida N. 2022 The three-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Surv...

    2022 doi

  14. [26]

    Dalal R, Li X, Nicola A, Zuntz J, Strauss MA, Sugiyama S, Zhang T, Rau MM, Mandelbaum R, Takada M, More S, Miyatake H, Kannawadi A, Shirasaki M, Taniguchi T, Takahashi R, Osato K, Hamana T, Oguri M, Nishizawa AJ, Malagón AAP , Sunayama T, Alonso D, Slosar A, Luo W, Armstrong R...

    2023

  15. [27]

    2023 Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and weak lensing with HSC and SDSS using the minimal bias model

    Sugiyama S, Miyatake H, More S, Li X, Shirasaki M, Takada M, Kobayashi Y, Takahashi R, Nishimichi T, Nishizawa AJ, Rau MM, Zhang T, Dalal R, Mandelbaum R, Strauss MA, Hamana T, Oguri M, Osato K, Kannawadi A, Hsieh BC, Luo W, Armstrong R, Bosch J, Komiyama Y, Lupton RH, Lust NB...

    2023

  16. [28]

    2023 Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and weak lensing with HSC and SDSS using the emulator based halo model

    Miyatake H, Sugiyama S, Takada M, Nishimichi T, Li X, Shirasaki M, More S, Kobayashi Y, Nishizawa AJ, Rau MM, Zhang T, Takahashi R, Dalal R, Mandelbaum R, Strauss MA, Hamana T, Oguri M, Osato K, Luo W, Kannawadi A, Hsieh BC, Armstrong R, Bosch J, Komiyama Y, Lupton RH, Lust NB...

    2023

  17. [29]

    2021 KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints

    Heymans C, Tröster T, Asgari M, Blake C, Hildebrandt H, Joachimi B, Kuijken K, Lin CA, Sánchez AG, van den Busch JL, Wright AH, Amon A, Bilicki M, de Jong J, Crocce M, Dvornik A, Erben T, Fortuna MC, Getman F, Giblin B, Glazebrook K, Hoekstra H, Joudaki S, Kannawadi A, Köhling...

    2021

  18. [30]

    2002 Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect

    Carlstrom JE, Holder GP , Reese ED. 2002 Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect. ARA&A 40, 643–680. (10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093803)

    2002

  19. [31]

    2019 Astrophysics with the Spatially and Spectrally Resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effects

    Mroczkowski T, Nagai D, Basu K, Chluba J, Sayers J, Adam R, Churazov E, Crites A, Di Mascolo L, Eckert D, Macias-Perez J, Mayet F, Perotto L, Pointecouteau E, Romero C, Ruppin F, Scannapieco E, ZuHone J. 2019 Astrophysics with the Spatially and Spectrally Resolved Sunyaev-Zeld...

    2019 doi

  20. [32]

    2018 KSZ tomography and the bispectrum

    Smith KM, Madhavacheril MS, Münchmeyer M, Ferraro S, Giri U, Johnson MC. 2018 KSZ tomography and the bispectrum. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1810.13423

    2018 arXiv

  21. [33]

    2019 Constraining local non-Gaussianities with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomography

    Münchmeyer M, Madhavacheril MS, Ferraro S, Johnson MC, Smith KM. 2019 Constraining local non-Gaussianities with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomography. Phys. Rev. D 100, 083508. (10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083508)

    2019 doi

  22. [34]

    2019 Cosmology with kSZ: breaking the optical depth degeneracy with Fast Radio Bursts

    Madhavacheril MS, Battaglia N, Smith KM, Sievers JL. 2019 Cosmology with kSZ: breaking the optical depth degeneracy with Fast Radio Bursts. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1901.02418. (10.48550/arXiv.1901.02418)

    2019 doi arXiv

  23. [35]

    2006 Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB

    Lewis A, Challinor A. 2006 Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB. Phys. Rep. 429, 1–65. (10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002)

    2006 doi

  24. [36]

    1997 Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes

    Jain B, Seljak U. 1997 Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes. ApJ 484, 560–573. (10.1086/304372)

    1997 doi

  25. [37]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Arroja F, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Ballardini M, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartolo N, Basak S, Battye R, Benabed K, Bernard JP , Bersanelli M, Bielewicz P , Bock JJ, Bond JR, Borrill J, Bouchet FR, Boulanger F, Bucher M, Buri...

    2020

  26. [38]

    2023 Growth of cosmic structure

    Huterer D. 2023 Growth of cosmic structure. A&A Rev. 31, 2. (10.1007/s00159-023-00147-4)

    2023 doi

  27. [39]

    1999 Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants

    Eisenstein DJ, Hu W. 1999 Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants. ApJ511, 5–15. (10.1086/306640)

    1999 doi

  28. [40]

    1998 Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function

    Eisenstein DJ, Hu W. 1998 Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function. ApJ 496, 605–

    1998

  29. [41]

    2000 Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models

    Lewis A, Challinor A, Lasenby A. 2000 Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models. ApJ 538, 473–476. (10.1086/309179)

    2000 doi

  30. [42]

    2011 The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    Lesgourgues J. 2011 The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1104.2932. (10.48550/arXiv.1104.2932)

    2011 doi arXiv

  31. [43]

    2022 COSMOPOWER: emulating cosmological power spectra for accelerated Bayesian inference from next-generation surveys

    Spurio Mancini A, Piras D, Alsing J, Joachimi B, Hobson MP . 2022 COSMOPOWER: emulating cosmological power spectra for accelerated Bayesian inference from next-generation surveys. MNRAS 511, 1771–1788. (10.1093/mnras/stac064)

    2022 doi

  32. [44]

    2024 High-accuracy emulators for observables inΛCDM, Nef f, Σmν, and w cosmologies

    Bolliet B, Spurio Mancini A, Hill JC, Madhavacheril M, Jense HT, Calabrese E, Dunkley J. 2024 High-accuracy emulators for observables inΛCDM, Nef f, Σmν, and w cosmologies. MNRAS 531, 1351–1370. (10.1093/mnras/stae1201)

    2024 doi

  33. [45]

    2024 A complete framework for cosmological emulation and inference with CosmoPower

    Jense HT, Harrison I, Calabrese E, Spurio Mancini A, Bolliet B, Dunkley J, Hill JC. 2024 A complete framework for cosmological emulation and inference with CosmoPower. arXiv e- prints p. arXiv:2405.07903. (10.48550/arXiv.2405.07903)

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [46]

    1974 Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation

    Press WH, Schechter P . 1974 Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation. ApJ 187, 425–438. (10.1086/152650)

    1974 doi

  35. [47]

    2020 Cosmic flows in the nearby Universe: new peculiar velocities from SNe and cosmological constraints

    Boruah SS, Hudson MJ, Lavaux G. 2020 Cosmic flows in the nearby Universe: new peculiar velocities from SNe and cosmological constraints. MNRAS 498, 2703–2718. (10.1093/mnras/staa2485)

    2020 doi

  36. [49]

    2021 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Detection of the pairwise kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect with SDSS DR15 galaxies

    Calafut V , Gallardo PA, Vavagiakis EM, Amodeo S, Aiola S, Austermann JE, Battaglia N, Battistelli ES, Beall JA, Bean R, Bond JR, Calabrese E, Choi SK, Cothard NF, Devlin MJ, Duell CJ, Duff SM, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Dunner R, Ferraro S, Guan Y, Hill JC, Hilton GC, Hilto...

    2021

  37. [50]

    2001 Weak gravitational lensing

    Bartelmann M, Schneider P . 2001 Weak gravitational lensing. Phys. Rep. 340, 291–472. (10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00082-X)

    2001 doi

  38. [51]

    2017 A 2500 deg2 CMB Lensing Map from Combined South Pole Telescope and Planck Data

    Omori Y, Chown R, Simard G, Story KT, Aylor K, Baxter EJ, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Cho HM, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Everett WB, George EM, Halverson NW, Harrington NL, Holder GP , Hou Z, Holzapfel WL, Hrubes JD, Knox L, Lee AT, Leitch EM...

    2017

  39. [52]

    2022 Baryonic feedback biases on fundamental physics from lensed CMB power spectra

    McCarthy F, Hill JC, Madhavacheril MS. 2022 Baryonic feedback biases on fundamental physics from lensed CMB power spectra. Phys. Rev. D 105, 023517. (10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023517)

    2022 doi

  40. [53]

    2006 Systematic errors in future weak- lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration

    Huterer D, Takada M, Bernstein G, Jain B. 2006 Systematic errors in future weak- lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration. MNRAS 366, 101–114. (10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09782.x)

    2006

  41. [54]

    2006 The Shear Testing Programme - I

    Heymans C, Van Waerbeke L, Bacon D, Berge J, Bernstein G, Bertin E, Bridle S, Brown ML, Clowe D, Dahle H, Erben T, Gray M, Hetterscheidt M, Hoekstra H, Hudelot P , Jarvis M, Kuijken K, Margoniner V , Massey R, Mellier Y, Nakajima R, Refregier A, Rhodes J, Schrabback T, Wittman...

    2006

  42. [55]

    2020 Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration

    Sheldon ES, Becker MR, MacCrann N, Jarvis M. 2020 Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration. ApJ 902, 138. (10.3847/1538-4357/abb595)

    2020 doi

  43. [56]

    2000 Photometric redshifts based on standard SED fitting procedures

    Bolzonella M, Miralles JM, Pelló R. 2000 Photometric redshifts based on standard SED fitting procedures. A&A 363, 476–492. (10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003380)

    2000 doi arXiv

  44. [57]

    2022 Photometric Redshifts for Next-Generation Surveys

    Newman JA, Gruen D. 2022 Photometric Redshifts for Next-Generation Surveys. ARA&A 60, 363–414. (10.1146/annurev-astro-032122-014611)

    2022 doi

  45. [58]

    2019 Beyond linear galaxy alignments

    Blazek JA, MacCrann N, Troxel MA, Fang X. 2019 Beyond linear galaxy alignments. Phys. Rev. D 100, 103506. (10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103506)

    2019 doi

  46. [59]

    2024 A Lagrangian theory for galaxy shape statistics

    Chen SF, Kokron N. 2024 A Lagrangian theory for galaxy shape statistics. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2024, 027. (10.1088/1475-7516/2024/01/027)

    2024 doi

  47. [60]

    2023 Joint analysis of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck

    Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Annis J, Ansarinejad B, Avila S, Bacon D, Baxter EJ, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Benson BA, Bernstein GM, Bertin E, Blazek J, Bleem LE, Bocquet S, Brooks D, Buckley-Geer E, Burke DL, Camacho H, Campos A, Carlstrom...

    2023

  48. [63]

    Hand N, Leauthaud A, Das S, Sherwin BD, Addison GE, Bond JR, Calabrese E, Charbonnier A, Devlin MJ, Dunkley J, Erben T, Hajian A, Halpern M, Harnois-Déraps J, Heymans C, Hildebrandt H, Hincks AD, Kneib JP , Kosowsky A, Makler M, Miller L, Moodley K, Moraes B, Niemack MD, Page ...

    2015

  49. [64]

    2015 Cross-correlation of Planck CMB lensing and CFHTLenS galaxy weak lensing maps

    Liu J, Hill JC. 2015 Cross-correlation of Planck CMB lensing and CFHTLenS galaxy weak lensing maps. Phys. Rev. D 92, 063517. (10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063517)

    2015 doi

  50. [65]

    2016 Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification data with SPT and Planck lensing

    Kirk D, Omori Y, Benoit-Lévy A, Cawthon R, Chang C, Larsen P , Amara A, Bacon D, Crawford TM, Dodelson S, Fosalba P , Giannantonio T, Holder G, Jain B, Kacprzak T, Lahav O, MacCrann N, Nicola A, Refregier A, Sheldon E, Story KT, Troxel MA, Vieira JD, Vikram V , Zuntz J, Abbott...

    2016

  51. [66]

    2019 Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Tomographic cross-correlations between Dark Energy Survey galaxies and CMB lensing from South Pole Telescope +Planck

    Omori Y, Giannantonio T, Porredon A, Baxter EJ, Chang C, Crocce M, Fosalba P , Alarcon A, Banik N, Blazek J, Bleem LE, Bridle SL, Cawthon R, Choi A, Chown R, Crawford T, Dodelson S, Drlica-Wagner A, Eifler TF, Elvin-Poole J, Friedrich O, Gruen D, Holder GP , Huterer D, Jain B,...

    2019

  52. [67]

    2016 CFHTLenS and RCSLenS cross-correlation with Planck lensing detected in fourier and configuration space

    Harnois-Déraps J, Tröster T, Hojjati A, van Waerbeke L, Asgari M, Choi A, Erben T, Heymans C, Hildebrandt H, Kitching TD, Miller L, Nakajima R, Viola M, Arnouts S, Coupon J, Moutard T. 2016 CFHTLenS and RCSLenS cross-correlation with Planck lensing detected in fourier and conf...

    2016 doi

  53. [68]

    2020 Cross-correlation between Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxy Weak Lensing and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing

    Marques GA, Liu J, Huffenberger KM, Colin Hill J. 2020 Cross-correlation between Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxy Weak Lensing and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing. ApJ 904, 182. (10.3847/1538-4357/abc003)

    2020 doi

  54. [69]

    2021 Strong detection of the CMB lensing and galaxy weak lensing cross-correlation from ACT-DR4, Planck Legacy, and KiDS-1000

    Robertson NC, Alonso D, Harnois-Déraps J, Darwish O, Kannawadi A, Amon A, Asgari M, Bilicki M, Calabrese E, Choi SK, Devlin MJ, Dunkley J, Dvornik A, Erben T, Ferraro S, Fortuna MC, Giblin B, Han D, Heymans C, Hildebrandt H, Hill JC, Hilton M, Ho SPP , Hoekstra H, Hubmayr J, H...

    2021

  55. [70]

    Chang C, Omori Y, Baxter EJ, Doux C, Choi A, Pandey S, Alarcon A, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Bernstein GM, Bianchini F, Blazek J, Bleem LE, 24royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

    2023

  56. [71]

    2024 Cosmology from cross-correlation of ACT-DR4 CMB lensing and DES-Y3 cosmic shear

    Shaikh S, Harrison I, van Engelen A, Marques GA, Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alves O, Amon A, An R, Bacon D, Battaglia N, Becker MR, Bernstein GM, Bertin E, Blazek J, Bond JR, Brooks D, Burke DL, Calabrese E, Rosell AC, Carretero J, Cawthon R, Chang C, Chen R, Choi A, Choi SK, da Co...

    2024

  57. [72]

    Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Annis J, Ansarinejad B, Avila S, Bacon D, Baxter EJ, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Benson BA, Bernstein GM, Bertin E, Blazek J, Bleem LE, Bocquet S, Brooks D, Buckley-Geer E, Burke DL, Camacho H, Campos A, Carlstrom...

    2023

  58. [73]

    2021 Dark energy survey year 3 results: weak lensing shape catalogue

    Gatti M, Sheldon E, Amon A, Becker M, Troxel M, Choi A, Doux C, MacCrann N, Navarro- Alsina A, Harrison I, Gruen D, Bernstein G, Jarvis M, Secco LF, Ferté A, Shin T, McCullough J, Rollins RP , Chen R, Chang C, Pandey S, Tutusaus I, Prat J, Elvin-Poole J, Sanchez C, Plazas AA, ...

    2021

  59. [74]

    2002 Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization

    Hu W, Okamoto T. 2002 Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization. ApJ 574, 566–574. (10.1086/341110)

    2002 doi

  60. [75]

    2021 Optimal Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Reconstruction and Parameter Estimation with SPTpol Data

    Millea M, Daley CM, Chou TL, Anderes E, Ade PAR, Anderson AJ, Austermann JE, Avva JS, Beall JA, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bianchini F, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Chaubal P , Chiang HC, Citron R, Moran CC, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Everett W, Gallicchio J,...

    2021

  61. [76]

    2017 Maximum a posteriori CMB lensing reconstruction

    Carron J, Lewis A. 2017 Maximum a posteriori CMB lensing reconstruction. Phys. Rev. D 96, 063510. (10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063510)

    2017 doi

  62. [77]

    2016 Planck 2015 results

    Planck Collaboration, Ade PAR, Aghanim N, Arnaud M, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartlett JG, et al.. 2016 Planck 2015 results. XV . Gravitational lensing. A&A 594, A15. (10.1051/0004-6361/201525941)

    2016 doi

  63. [78]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Ballardini M, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartolo N, Basak S, Benabed K, Bernard JP , Bersanelli M, Bielewicz P , Bock JJ, Bond JR, Borrill J, Bouchet FR, Boulanger F, Bucher M, Burigana C, Calabrese E,...

    2020

  64. [79]

    2022 CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    Carron J, Mirmelstein M, Lewis A. 2022 CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2022, 039. (10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039)

    2022 doi

  65. [80]

    2017 Two-season Atacama Cosmology Telescope polarimeter lensing power spectrum

    Sherwin BD, van Engelen A, Sehgal N, Madhavacheril M, Addison GE, Aiola S, Allison R, Battaglia N, Becker DT, Beall JA, Bond JR, Calabrese E, Datta R, Devlin MJ, Dünner R, Dunkley J, Fox AE, Gallardo P , Halpern M, Hasselfield M, Henderson S, Hill JC, Hilton GC, Hubmayr J, Hug...

    2017

  66. [84]

    2023 Measurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background using SPT-3G 2018 data

    Pan Z, Bianchini F, Wu WLK, Ade PAR, Ahmed Z, Anderes E, Anderson AJ, Ansarinejad B, Archipley M, Aylor K, Balkenhol L, Barry PS, Basu Thakur R, Benabed K, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Bouchet FR, Bryant L, Byrum K, Camphuis E, Carlstrom JE, Carter FW, Cecil TW, Chang CL, C...

    2023

  67. [85]

    2019 A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Potential and Power Spectrum from 500 deg 2 of SPTpol Temperature and Polarization Data

    Wu WLK, Mocanu LM, Ade PAR, Anderson AJ, Austermann JE, Avva JS, Beall JA, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bianchini F, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Chiang HC, Citron R, Corbett Moran C, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Everett W, Gallicchio J, George EM, Gilbert A, Gup...

    2019

  68. [86]

    2017 A 2500 deg2 CMB Lensing Map from Combined South Pole Telescope and Planck Data

    Omori Y, Chown R, Simard G, Story KT, Aylor K, Baxter EJ, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Cho HM, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Everett WB, George EM, Halverson NW, Harrington NL, Holder GP , Hou Z, Holzapfel WL, Hrubes JD, Knox L, Lee AT, Leitch EM...

    2017

  69. [88]

    (10.3847/1538-4357/ab4186)

    doi

  70. [89]

    2011 CMB temperature lensing power reconstruction

    Hanson D, Challinor A, Efstathiou G, Bielewicz P . 2011 CMB temperature lensing power reconstruction. Phys. Rev. D 83, 043005. (10.1103/PhysRevD.83.043005)

    2011 doi

  71. [90]

    2010 Simulations of the Microwave Sky

    Sehgal N, Bode P , Das S, Hernandez-Monteagudo C, Huffenberger K, Lin YT, Ostriker JP , Trac H. 2010 Simulations of the Microwave Sky. ApJ709, 920–936. (10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/920)

    2010 doi

  72. [91]

    2014 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum Biases from Galaxies and Clusters Using High-angular Resolution 28royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil

    van Engelen A, Bhattacharya S, Sehgal N, Holder GP , Zahn O, Nagai D. 2014 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum Biases from Galaxies and Clusters Using High-angular Resolution 28royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

    2014 doi

  73. [92]

    2003 Lensing reconstruction with CMB temperature and polarization

    Kesden M, Cooray A, Kamionkowski M. 2003 Lensing reconstruction with CMB temperature and polarization. Phys. Rev. D 67, 123507. (10.1103/PhysRevD.67.123507)

    2003 doi

  74. [93]

    2020 Lower bias, lower noise CMB lensing with foreground- hardened estimators

    Sailer N, Schaan E, Ferraro S. 2020 Lower bias, lower noise CMB lensing with foreground- hardened estimators. Phys. Rev. D 102, 063517. (10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063517)

    2020 doi

  75. [94]

    2019 Foreground-Immune Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing with Shear-Only Reconstruction

    Schaan E, Ferraro S. 2019 Foreground-Immune Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing with Shear-Only Reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181301. (10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.181301)

    2019 doi

  76. [95]

    2023 CMB lensing with shear-only reconstruction on the full sky

    Qu FJ, Challinor A, Sherwin BD. 2023 CMB lensing with shear-only reconstruction on the full sky. Phys. Rev. D 108, 063518. (10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063518)

    2023 doi

  77. [97]

    2021 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: a CMB lensing mass map over 2100 square degrees of sky and its cross-correlation with BOSS-CMASS galaxies

    Darwish O, Madhavacheril MS, Sherwin BD, Aiola S, Battaglia N, Beall JA, Becker DT, Bond JR, Calabrese E, Choi SK, Devlin MJ, Dunkley J, Dünner R, Ferraro S, Fox AE, Gallardo PA, Guan Y, Halpern M, Han D, Hasselfield M, Hill JC, Hilton GC, Hilton M, Hincks AD, Patty Ho SP , Hu...

    2021

  78. [98]

    2021 Partially constrained internal linear combination: A method for low-noise CMB foreground mitigation

    Abylkairov YS, Darwish O, Hill JC, Sherwin BD. 2021 Partially constrained internal linear combination: A method for low-noise CMB foreground mitigation. Phys. Rev. D 103, 103510. (10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103510)

    2021 doi

  79. [99]

    2024 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis

    MacCrann N, Sherwin BD, Qu FJ, Namikawa T, Madhavacheril MS, Abril-Cabezas I, An R, Austermann JE, Battaglia N, Battistelli ES, Beall JA, Bolliet B, Bond JR, Cai H, Calabrese E, Coulton WR, Darwish O, Duff SM, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Farren GS, Ferraro S, Golec JE, Guan Y...

    2024

  80. [100]

    2018 Mitigating foreground biases in CMB lensing reconstruction using cleaned gradi ents

    Madhavacheril MS, Hill JC. 2018 Mitigating foreground biases in CMB lensing reconstruction using cleaned gradi ents. Phys. Rev. D 98, 023534. (10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023534)

    2018 doi

  81. [101]

    2023 Optimizing foreground mitigation for CMB lensing with combined multifrequency and geometric methods

    Darwish O, Sherwin BD, Sailer N, Schaan E, Ferraro S. 2023 Optimizing foreground mitigation for CMB lensing with combined multifrequency and geometric methods. Phys. Rev. D 107, 043519. (10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043519)

    2023 doi

  82. [102]

    2023 Measurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background using SPT-3G 2018 data

    Pan Z, Bianchini F, Wu WLK, Ade PAR, Ahmed Z, Anderes E, Anderson AJ, Ansarinejad B, Archipley M, Aylor K, Balkenhol L, Barry PS, Basu Thakur R, Benabed K, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Bouchet FR, Bryant L, Byrum K, Camphuis E, Carlstrom JE, Carter FW, Cecil TW, Chang CL, C...

    2023

  83. [103]

    2023 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: map-based noise simulations for DR6

    Atkins Z, Duivenvoorden AJ, Coulton WR, Qu FJ, Aiola S, Calabrese E, Chesmore GE, Choi SK, Devlin MJ, Dunkley J, Hervías-Caimapo C, Guan Y, Posta AL, Li Z, Louis T, Madhavacheril MS, Moodley K, Naess S, Nati F, Niemack MD, Page L, Puddu R, Salatino M, Sifón C, Staggs ST, Varga...

    2023 doi

  84. [104]

    2021 Optimal multifrequency weighting for CMB lensing

    Sailer N, Schaan E, Ferraro S, Darwish O, Sherwin B. 2021 Optimal multifrequency weighting for CMB lensing. Phys. Rev. D 104, 123514. (10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123514)

    2021 doi

  85. [105]

    2020 CMB lensing power spectrum estimation without instrument noise bias

    Madhavacheril MS, Smith KM, Sherwin BD, Naess S. 2020 CMB lensing power spectrum estimation without instrument noise bias. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2011.02475. (10.48550/arXiv.2011.02475)

    2020 doi arXiv

  86. [106]

    2024 Crosstalk Effects in Microwave SQUID Multiplexed TES Bolometer Readout

    Groh JC, Ahmed Z, Henderson SW, Hubmayr J, Mates JAB, Silva-Feaver M, Ullom J, Yu C. 2024 Crosstalk Effects in Microwave SQUID Multiplexed TES Bolometer Readout. Journal of Low T emperature Physics. (10.1007/s10909-024-03126-w)

    2024 doi

  87. [107]

    2021 Instrumental systematics biases in CMB lensing reconstruction: A simulation-based assessment

    Mirmelstein M, Fabbian G, Lewis A, Peloton J. 2021 Instrumental systematics biases in CMB lensing reconstruction: A simulation-based assessment. Phys. Rev. D 103, 123540. (10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123540)

    2021 doi

  88. [108]

    2013 Bias-hardened CMB lensing

    Namikawa T, Hanson D, Takahashi R. 2013 Bias-hardened CMB lensing. MNRAS 431, 609–

    2013

  89. [109]

    (10.1093/mnras/stt195)

    doi

  90. [110]

    2011 Detection of the Power Spectrum of Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope

    Das S, Sherwin BD, Aguirre P , Appel JW, Bond JR, Carvalho CS, Devlin MJ, Dunkley J, Dünner R, Essinger-Hileman T, Fowler JW, Hajian A, Halpern M, Hasselfield M, Hincks AD, Hlozek R, Huffenberger KM, Hughes JP , Irwin KD, Klein J, Kosowsky A, Lupton RH, Marriage TA, Marsden D,...

    2011

  91. [111]

    van Engelen A, Keisler R, Zahn O, Aird KA, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Cho HM, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Dudley J, George EM, Halverson NW, Holder GP , Holzapfel WL, Hoover S, Hou Z, Hrubes JD, Joy M, Knox L, Lee AT, Leitch 30royalsocietypub...

    2012

  92. [112]

    (10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06)

    doi

  93. [113]

    2024 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters

    Madhavacheril MS, Qu FJ, Sherwin BD, MacCrann N, Li Y, Abril-Cabezas I, Ade PAR, Aiola S, Alford T, Amiri M, Amodeo S, An R, Atkins Z, Austermann JE, Battaglia N, Battistelli ES, Beall JA, Bean R, Beringue B, Bhandarkar T, Biermann E, Bolliet B, Bond JR, Cai H, Calabrese E, Ca...

    2024

  94. [114]

    2020 The baryon density of the Universe from an improved rate of deuterium burning

    Mossa V , Stöckel K, Cavanna F, Ferraro F, Aliotta M, Barile F, Bemmerer D, Best A, Boeltzig A, Broggini C, Bruno CG, Caciolli A, Chillery T, Ciani GF, Corvisiero P , Csedreki L, Davinson T, Depalo R, Di Leva A, Elekes Z, Fiore EM, Formicola A, Fülöp Z, Gervino G, Guglielmetti...

    2020

  95. [115]

    BICEP2 Collaboration, Keck Array Collaboration, Ade PAR, Ahmed Z, Aikin RW, Alexander KD, Barkats D, Benton SJ, Bischoff CA, Bock JJ, Bowens-Rubin R, Brevik JA, Buder I, Bullock E, Buza V , Connors J, Crill BP , Duband L, Dvorkin C, Filippini JP , Fliescher S, Grayson J, Halpe...

    2016

  96. [116]

    2021 Avoiding baryonic feedback effects on neutrino mass measurements from CMB lensing

    McCarthy F, Foreman S, van Engelen A. 2021 Avoiding baryonic feedback effects on neutrino mass measurements from CMB lensing. Phys. Rev. D 103, 103538. (10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103538)

    2021 doi

  97. [117]

    2015 A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Gravitational Lensing Potential from 100 Square Degrees of SPTpol Data

    Story KT, Hanson D, Ade PAR, Aird KA, Austermann JE, Beall JA, Bender AN, Benson BA, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Chiang HC, Cho HM, Citron R, Crawford TM, Crites AT, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Everett W, Gallicchio J, Gao J, George EM, Gilbert A, Halverson NW, Harrington N, He...

    2015

  98. [118]

    2014 Planck 2013 results

    Planck Collaboration, Ade PAR, Aghanim N, Armitage-Caplan C, Arnaud M, Ashdown M, Atrio-Barand ela F, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Banday AJ, et al.. 2014 Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure. A&A 571, A17. (10.1051/0004-6361/201321543)

    2014 doi

  99. [119]

    2014 Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing Power Spectrum with the POLARBEAR Experiment

    Ade PAR, Akiba Y, Anthony AE, Arnold K, Atlas M, Barron D, Boettger D, Borrill J, Chapman S, Chinone Y, Dobbs M, Elleflot T, Errard J, Fabbian G, Feng C, Flanigan D, Gilbert A, Grainger W, Halverson NW, Hasegawa M, Hattori K, Hazumi M, Holzapfel WL, Hori Y, Howard J, Hyland P ...

    2014

  100. [120]

    2022 Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: Constraints on cosmological parameters and galaxy-bias models from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the redMaGiC sample

    Pandey S, Krause E, DeRose J, MacCrann N, Jain B, Crocce M, Blazek J, Choi A, Huang H, To C, Fang X, Elvin-Poole J, Prat J, Porredon A, Secco LF, Rodriguez-Monroy M, Weaverdyck N, Park Y, Raveri M, Rozo E, Rykoff ES, Bernstein GM, Sánchez C, Jarvis M, Troxel MA, Zacharegkas G,...

    2022

  101. [121]

    2022 Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MAGLIM lens sample

    Porredon A, Crocce M, Elvin-Poole J, Cawthon R, Giannini G, De Vicente J, Carnero Rosell A, Ferrero I, Krause E, Fang X, Prat J, Rodriguez-Monroy M, Pandey S, Pocino A, Castander FJ, Choi A, Amon A, Tutusaus I, Dodelson S, Sevilla-Noarbe I, Fosalba P , Gaztanaga E, Alarcon A, ...

    2022

  102. [122]

    2016 Planck 2015 results

    Planck Collaboration, Ade PAR, Aghanim N, Arnaud M, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Banday AJ, Barreiro RB, Bartlett JG, et al.. 2016 Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. A&A 594, A13. (10.1051/0004-6361/201525830)

    2016 doi

  103. [123]

    2022 CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec

    Rosenberg E, Gratton S, Efstathiou G. 2022 CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec. MNRAS 517, 4620–4636. (10.1093/mnras/stac2744)

    2022 doi

  104. [124]

    2024 Not all lensing is low: An analysis of DESI×DES using the Lagrangian Effective Theory of LSS

    Chen S, DeRose J, Zhou R, White M, Ferraro S, Blake C, Lange JU, Wechsler RH, Aguilar J, Ahlen S, Brooks D, Claybaugh T, Dawson K, de la Macorra A, Doel P , Font-Ribera A, Gaztañaga E, Gontcho SGA, Gutierrez G, Honscheid K, Howlett C, Kehoe R, Kirkby D, Kisner T, Kremin A, Lan...

    2024 doi arXiv

  105. [125]

    2013 Clustering-based redshift estimation: method and application to data

    Ménard B, Scranton R, Schmidt S, Morrison C, Jeong D, Budavari T, Rahman M. 2013 Clustering-based redshift estimation: method and application to data. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1303.4722. (10.48550/arXiv.1303.4722)

    2013 doi arXiv

  106. [126]

    2020 unWISE tomography of Planck CMB lensing

    Krolewski A, Ferraro S, Schlafly EF, White M. 2020 unWISE tomography of Planck CMB lensing. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020, 047. (10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/047)

    2020 doi

  107. [127]

    Chang C, Omori Y, Baxter EJ, Doux C, Choi A, Pandey S, Alarcon A, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Bernstein GM, Bianchini F, Blazek J, Bleem LE, Camacho H, Campos A, Carnero Rosell A, Carrasco Kind M, Cawthon R, Chen R, Cordero J, Crawford TM, Crocce...

    2023

  108. [128]

    2024 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Cosmology from Cross-correlations of unWISE Galaxies and ACT DR6 CMB Lensing

    Farren GS, Krolewski A, MacCrann N, Ferraro S, Abril-Cabezas I, An R, Atkins Z, Battaglia N, Bond JR, Calabrese E, Choi SK, Darwish O, Devlin MJ, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Hill JC, Hilton M, Huffenberger KM, Kim J, Louis T, Madhavacheril MS, Marques GA, McMahon J, Moodley K...

    2024

  109. [129]

    2008 Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations

    Newman JA. 2008 Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations. ApJ 684, 88–101. (10.1086/589982)

    2008 doi

  110. [130]

    2024 Suppression without Thawing: Constraining Structure Formation and Dark Energy with Galaxy Clustering

    Chen SF, Ivanov MM, Philcox OHE, Wenzl L. 2024 Suppression without Thawing: Constraining Structure Formation and Dark Energy with Galaxy Clustering. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2406.13388. (10.48550/arXiv.2406.13388)

    2024 doi arXiv

  111. [131]

    Gatti M, Jain B, Chang C, Raveri M, Zürcher D, Secco L, Whiteway L, Jeffrey N, Doux C, Kacprzak T, Bacon D, Fosalba P , Alarcon A, Amon A, Bechtol K, Becker M, Bernstein G, Blazek J, Campos A, Choi A, Davis C, Derose J, Dodelson S, Elsner F, Elvin-Poole J, Everett S, Ferte A, ...

    2022

  112. [132]

    2024 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR6 and DESI: Structure formation over cosmic time with a measurement of the cross- correlation of CMB Lensing and Luminous Red Galaxies

    Kim J, Sailer N, Madhavacheril MS, Ferraro S, Abril-Cabezas I, Aguilar JN, Ahlen S, Bond JR, Brooks D, Burtin E, Calabrese E, Chen SF, Choi SK, Claybaugh T, Darwish O, de la Macorra A, DeRose J, Devlin M, Dey A, Doel P , Dunkley J, Embil-Villagra C, Farren GS, Font- Ribera A, ...

    2024 doi arXiv

  113. [133]

    2024 Cosmological constraints from the cross-correlation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies with CMB lensing from Planck PR4 and ACT DR6

    Sailer N, Kim J, Ferraro S, Madhavacheril MS, White M, Abril-Cabezas I, Aguilar JN, Ahlen S, Bond JR, Brooks D, Burtin E, Calabrese E, Chen SF, Choi SK, Claybaugh T, Dawson K, de la Macorra A, DeRose J, Dey A, Dey B, Doel P , Dunkley J, Embil-Villagra C, Farren GS, Font- Riber...

    2024 doi arXiv

  114. [134]

    2022 BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: Λ CDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole

    Philcox OHE, Ivanov MM. 2022 BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: Λ CDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole. Phys. Rev. D 105, 043517. (10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043517)

    2022 doi

  115. [135]

    2024 Exploring the baryonic effect signature in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 cosmic shear two-point correlations on small scales: theS8 tension remains present

    Terasawa R, Li X, Takada M, Nishimichi T, Tanaka S, Sugiyama S, Kurita T, Zhang T, Shirasaki M, Takahashi R, Miyatake H, More S, Nishizawa AJ. 2024 Exploring the baryonic effect signature in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 cosmic shear two-point correlations on small scales: theS...

    2024 doi arXiv

  116. [136]

    2021 Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Combined kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements from BOSS CMASS and LOWZ halos

    Schaan E, Ferraro S, Amodeo S, Battaglia N, Aiola S, Austermann JE, Beall JA, Bean R, Becker DT, Bond RJ, Calabrese E, Calafut V , Choi SK, Denison EV , Devlin MJ, Duff SM, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Dünner R, Gallardo PA, Guan Y, Han D, Hill JC, Hilton GC, Hilton M, Hložek ...

    2021

  117. [137]

    2023 DES Y3 cosmic shear down to small scales: Constraints on cosmology and baryons

    Aricò G, Angulo RE, Zennaro M, Contreras S, Chen A, Hernández-Monteagudo C. 2023 DES Y3 cosmic shear down to small scales: Constraints on cosmology and baryons. A&A 678, A109. (10.1051/0004-6361/202346539)

    2023 doi

  118. [138]

    2022 A non-linear solution to the S8 tension?

    Amon A, Efstathiou G. 2022 A non-linear solution to the S8 tension?. MNRAS 516, 5355–5366. (10.1093/mnras/stac2429)

    2022 doi

  119. [139]

    2023 A non-linear solution to the S 8 tension - II

    Preston C, Amon A, Efstathiou G. 2023 A non-linear solution to the S 8 tension - II. Analysis of DES Year 3 cosmic shear. MNRAS 525, 5554–5564. (10.1093/mnras/stad2573)

    2023 doi

  120. [140]

    2024 Late time modification of structure growth and the S 8 tension

    Lin MX, Jain B, Raveri M, Baxter EJ, Chang C, Gatti M, Lee S, Muir J. 2024 Late time modification of structure growth and the S 8 tension. Phys. Rev. D 109, 063523. (10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063523)

    2024 doi

  121. [141]

    2023 Ultra-light axions and the S 8 tension: joint constraints from the cosmic microwave background and galaxy clustering

    Rogers KK, Hložek R, Laguë A, Ivanov MM, Philcox OHE, Cabass G, Akitsu K, Marsh DJE. 2023 Ultra-light axions and the S 8 tension: joint constraints from the cosmic microwave background and galaxy clustering. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2023, 023. (10.1088/1475- 7516/2023/06/023)

    2023 doi

  122. [142]

    2021 Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Modeling the gas thermodynamics in BOSS CMASS galaxies from kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements

    Amodeo S, Battaglia N, Schaan E, Ferraro S, Moser E, Aiola S, Austermann JE, Beall JA, Bean R, Becker DT, Bond RJ, Calabrese E, Calafut V , Choi SK, Denison EV , Devlin M, Duff SM, Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Dünner R, Gallardo PA, Hall KR, Han D, Hill JC, Hilton GC, Hilton M...

    2021

  123. [143]

    2024 Evidence for large baryonic feedback at low and intermediate redshifts from kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich observations with ACT and DESI photometric galaxies

    Hadzhiyska B, Ferraro S, Ried Guachalla B, Schaan E, Aguilar J, Battaglia N, Bond JR, Brooks D, Calabrese E, Choi SK, Claybaugh T, Coulton WR, Dawson K, Devlin M, Dey B, Doel P , Duivenvoorden AJ, Dunkley J, Farren GS, Font-Ribera A, Forero-Romero JE, Gallardo PA, Gaztañaga E,...

    2024 doi arXiv

  124. [144]

    2023 Evidence for Suppression of Structure Growth in the Concordance Cosmological Model

    Nguyen NM, Huterer D, Wen Y. 2023 Evidence for Suppression of Structure Growth in the Concordance Cosmological Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111001. 34royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsta Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 0000000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

    2023 doi

  125. [145]

    2014 SPT- 3G: a next-generation cosmic microwave background polarization experiment on the South Pole telescope

    Benson BA, Ade PAR, Ahmed Z, Allen SW, Arnold K, Austermann JE, Bender AN, Bleem LE, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Cho HM, Cliche JF, Crawford TM, Cukierman A, de Haan T, Dobbs MA, Dutcher D, Everett W, Gilbert A, Halverson NW, Hanson D, Harrington NL, Hattori K, Henning JW, Hilton ...

    2014

  126. [146]

    2016 CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition

    Abazajian KN, Adshead P , Ahmed Z, Allen SW, Alonso D, Arnold KS, Baccigalupi C, Bartlett JG, Battaglia N, Benson BA, Bischoff CA, Borrill J, Buza V , Calabrese E, Caldwell R, Carlstrom JE, Chang CL, Crawford TM, Cyr-Racine FY, De Bernardis F, de Haan T, di Serego Alighieri S,...

    2016 arXiv

  127. [147]

    2023 5σ tension between Planck cosmic microwave background and eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest and constraints on physics beyond ΛCDM

    Rogers KK, Poulin V . 2023 5σ tension between Planck cosmic microwave background and eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest and constraints on physics beyond ΛCDM. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2311.16377. (10.48550/arXiv.2311.16377)

    2023 doi arXiv

  128. [148]

    1993 Principles of Physical Cosmology

    Peebles PJE. 1993 Principles of Physical Cosmology . (10.1515/9780691206721)

    1993 doi

  129. [149]

    2019 The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts

    Ade P , Aguirre J, Ahmed Z, Aiola S, Ali A, Alonso D, Alvarez MA, Arnold K, Ashton P , Austermann J, et al.. 2019 The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2019, 056. (10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056)

    2019 doi

  130. [150]

    The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, Mandelbaum R, Eifler T, Hložek R, Collett T, Gawiser E, Scolnic D, Alonso D, Awan H, Biswas R, Blazek J, Burchat P , Chisari NE, Dell’Antonio I, Digel S, Frieman J, Goldstein DA, Hook I, Ivezi´ c Ž, Kahn SM, Kamath S, Kirkby D, Kitch...

    2018 doi arXiv

  131. [151]

    2020 Modern Cosmology

    Dodelson S, Schmidt F. 2020 Modern Cosmology. (10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2)

    2020 doi

  132. [152]

    2024 Euclid

    Euclid Collaboration, Mellier Y, Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso JA, Achúcarro A, Adamek J, Adam R, Addison GE, Aghanim N, Aguena M, et al.. 2024 Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2405.13491. (10.48550/arXiv.2405.13491)

    2024 doi

  133. [153]

    2015 Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    Spergel D, Gehrels N, Baltay C, Bennett D, Breckinridge J, Donahue M, Dressler A, Gaudi BS, Greene T, Guyon O, Hirata C, Kalirai J, Kasdin NJ, Macintosh B, Moos W, Perlmutter S, Postman M, Rauscher B, Rhodes J, Wang Y, Weinberg D, Benford D, Hudson M, Jeong WS, Mellier Y, Trau...

    2015 doi arXiv

  134. [154]

    2016 The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    DESI Collaboration, Aghamousa A, Aguilar J, Ahlen S, Alam S, Allen LE, Allende Prieto C, Annis J, Bailey S, Balland C, et al.. 2016 The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1611.00036

    2016 arXiv

  135. [157]

    1977 The growth of density perturbations in zero pressure Friedmann-Lemaître universes

    Heath DJ. 1977 The growth of density perturbations in zero pressure Friedmann-Lemaître universes.. MNRAS 179, 351–358. (10.1093/mnras/179.3.351)

    1977 doi

  136. [158]

    2011 Dark Matter Halos in the Standard Cosmological Model: Results from the Bolshoi Simulation

    Klypin AA, Trujillo-Gomez S, Primack J. 2011 Dark Matter Halos in the Standard Cosmological Model: Results from the Bolshoi Simulation. ApJ 740, 102. (10.1088/0004- 637X/740/2/102)

    2011 doi

  137. [259]

    (10.3847/1538-4357/ac02bb)

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.